Nefs Harold T, Harris Julie M
School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland, United Kingdom.
J Vis. 2008 Mar 12;8(3):8.1-16. doi: 10.1167/8.3.8.
Induced motion is the false impression that physically stationary objects move when in the presence of other objects that really move. In this study, we investigated this motion illusion in the depth dimension. We raised three related questions, as follows: (1) What cues in the stimulus are responsible for this motion illusion in depth? (2) Is the size of this illusion affected by vergence eye movements? And (3) are the effects of eye movements different for motion in depth and for motion in the frontoparallel plane? To answer these questions, we measured the point of subjective stationarity. Observers viewed an inducer target that oscillated in depth and a test target that was located directly above it. The test target moved in phase or out of phase with the inducer, but with a smaller amplitude. Observers had to indicate whether the test target and the inducer target moved in phase or out of phase with one another. They were asked to keep their eyes either on the test target or on the inducer. For motion in depth, created by binocular disparity and retinal size change or by binocular disparity alone, we found that when the eyes followed the inducer, subjective stationarity occurred at approximately 40-45% of the inducer's amplitude. When the eyes were kept fixated on the test target, the bias decreased tenfold to around 4%. When size change was the only cue to motion in depth, there was no illusory motion. When the eyes were kept on an inducer moving in the frontoparallel plane, induced motion was of the same order as for induced motion in depth, namely, approximately 44%. When the induced motion was in the frontoparallel plane, we found that perceived stationarity occurred at approximately 23% of inducer's amplitude when the eyes were kept on the test target.
诱导运动是一种错误的印象,即当处于真正运动的其他物体存在时,物理上静止的物体看起来在移动。在本研究中,我们在深度维度上研究了这种运动错觉。我们提出了三个相关问题,如下:(1)刺激中的哪些线索导致了深度上的这种运动错觉?(2)这种错觉的大小是否受双眼视轴汇聚眼动的影响?以及(3)眼动对深度运动和额状面运动的影响是否不同?为了回答这些问题,我们测量了主观静止点。观察者观看一个在深度上振荡的诱导目标和一个直接位于其上方的测试目标。测试目标与诱导目标同相或异相移动,但幅度较小。观察者必须指出测试目标和诱导目标是同相还是异相移动。他们被要求将眼睛注视在测试目标或诱导目标上。对于由双眼视差和视网膜大小变化或仅由双眼视差产生的深度运动,我们发现当眼睛跟随诱导目标时,主观静止出现在诱导目标幅度的约40 - 45%处。当眼睛固定在测试目标上时,偏差降低到约4%,降低了十倍。当大小变化是深度运动的唯一线索时,没有错觉运动。当眼睛注视在额状面移动的诱导目标上时,诱导运动与深度诱导运动的量级相同,即约44%。当诱导运动在额状面时,我们发现当眼睛注视在测试目标上时,感知到的静止出现在诱导目标幅度的约23%处。