Conrad Mark F, Ye Jason Y, Chung Thomas K, Davison J Kenneth, Cambria Richard P
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery of the General Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul;48(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.047. Epub 2008 May 16.
Paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAA) repair has been associated with poor survival. Little information exists concerning the spectrum of severity that characterizes spinal cord ischemic (SCI) complications. This study stratified SCI by deficit severity to determine its impact on late survival and functional outcomes.
A review of our prospectively maintained thoracic aortic database was performed from May 1987 through December 2005 to identify patients who experienced SCI of any extent after TAA repair. During this period, 576 patients underwent descending thoracic aortic repair (93 open, 105 endovascular [TEVAR]) or open TAA repair (279 extent I to III; 99 extent IV). To stratify severity of SCI, we created a spinal cord ischemia deficit (SCID) scale, which is defined as: I, flaccid paralysis; II, average neurologic muscle grade indicating <50% function; and III, average neurologic muscle grade indicating >50% function. Long-term outcomes were evaluated in relation to these groups by actuarial methods.
During the study period, 64 (11.1%) patients developed SCI of any severity (7 of 105 [6.6%] TEVAR, 57 of 471 [12%] open). These were stratified by SCID level: I, 24 (37.5%); II, 31 (48.4%); and III, 9 (14.1%). SCI was immediate in 33 (54.1%) and delayed in 28 (45.9%). Most SCI (6 of 7) associated with TEVAR was delayed. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the SCI group than the overall patient cohort (15 of 64 [23.4%] vs 41 of 512 [8%], P < .001) and varied by SCID level: I, 11 of 24 (45.8%); II, 4 of 31 (12.9%); and III, 0 of 9 (0%; P = .001). The 5-year actuarial survival for all SCI was lower than for non-SCI patients (25% +/- 6% vs 51% +/- 3%, P < .001) and varied linearly with SCID level but was similar between SCID II/III and the non-SCI patients (41% +/- 10% vs 51% +/- 3%, P = .281). No SCID I patients were alive at 5 years. No patients with SCID I recovered the ability to walk, but eight of 11 (73%) with SCID II and the nine (100%) with SCID III could ambulate with or without assistance at last follow-up.
Survival and functional outcomes correlate with SCI severity. Patients with SCID I have a poor long-term outlook. Survival of SCID II/III patients is similar to non-SCI patients; most recover the ability to ambulate.
胸腹主动脉瘤(TAA)修复术后发生截瘫与生存率低相关。关于脊髓缺血(SCI)并发症严重程度范围的信息较少。本研究根据神经功能缺损严重程度对SCI进行分层,以确定其对远期生存和功能结局的影响。
对1987年5月至2005年12月前瞻性维护的胸主动脉数据库进行回顾,以确定TAA修复术后发生任何程度SCI的患者。在此期间,576例患者接受了降主动脉修复(93例开放手术,105例血管腔内修复[TEVAR])或开放性TAA修复(279例I至III型;99例IV型)。为了对SCI严重程度进行分层,我们创建了脊髓缺血缺损(SCID)量表,其定义为:I级,弛缓性瘫痪;II级,平均神经肌肉分级表明功能<50%;III级,平均神经肌肉分级表明功能>50%。通过精算方法评估这些组的长期结局。
在研究期间,64例(11.1%)患者发生了任何严重程度的SCI(105例TEVAR中有7例[6.6%],471例开放手术中有57例[12%])。这些患者根据SCID水平分层:I级,24例(37.5%);II级,31例(48.4%);III级,9例(14.1%)。33例(54.1%)患者的SCI为即刻发生,28例(45.9%)为延迟发生。与TEVAR相关的大多数SCI(7例中的6例)为延迟发生。SCI组的30天死亡率显著高于总体患者队列(64例中的15例[23.4%] vs 512例中的41例[8%],P <.001),且因SCID水平而异:I级,24例中的11例(45.8%);II级,31例中的4例(12.9%);III级,9例中的0例(0%;P =.001)。所有SCI患者的5年精算生存率低于非SCI患者(25%±6% vs 51%±3%,P <.001),并与SCID水平呈线性变化,但SCID II/III组与非SCI患者相似(41%±10% vs 51%±3%,P =.281)。5年时没有SCID I级患者存活。没有SCID I级患者恢复行走能力,但11例SCID II级患者中有8例(73%)以及9例SCID III级患者(100%)在最后一次随访时能够在有或无辅助的情况下行走。
生存和功能结局与SCI严重程度相关。SCID I级患者的长期预后较差。SCID II/III级患者的生存率与非SCI患者相似;大多数患者恢复了行走能力。