Peterson Chris J, Leach Andrea D
Department of Plant Biology, 2502 Plant Science Building, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2008 Mar;18(2):407-20. doi: 10.1890/07-0603.1.
Recent conceptual advances address forest response to multiple disturbances within a brief time period, providing an ideal framework for examining the consequences of natural disturbances followed by anthropogenic management activities. The combination of two or more disturbances in a short period may produce "ecological surprises," and models predict a threshold of cumulative disturbance severity above which forest composition will be drastically altered and regeneration may be impaired. Salvage logging (the harvesting of timber after natural disturbances; also called "salvaging" or "sanitary logging") is common, but there have been no tests of the manner in which salvaging after natural wind disturbance affects woody plant regeneration. Here we present findings from three years after a moderate-severity wind disturbance in west-central Tennessee, USA. We compare two unsalvaged sites and two sites that had intermediate-intensity salvaging. Our approach demonstrates the calculation of cumulative severity measures, which combine natural windthrow severity and anthropogenic tree cutting and removal, on a plot-by-plot basis. Seedling/sapling density and species richness were not influenced by cumulative disturbance severity, but species diversity showed a marginal increase with increasing cumulative severity. The amount of compositional change (from predisturbance trees to post-disturbance seedlings/saplings) increased significantly with cumulative severity of disturbance but showed no evidence of thresholds within the severity range examined. Overall, few deleterious changes were evident in these sites. Moderate-severity natural disturbances followed by moderate-intensity salvaging may have little detrimental effect on forest regeneration and diversity in these systems; the ecological surprises and threshold compositional change are more likely after combinations of natural and anthropogenic disturbances that have a much greater cumulative severity.
近期的概念进展探讨了森林在短时间内对多种干扰的响应,为研究自然干扰后接人为管理活动的后果提供了理想框架。在短时间内两种或更多种干扰的组合可能产生“生态意外”,并且模型预测了累积干扰严重程度的阈值,超过该阈值森林组成将发生剧烈改变且更新可能受到损害。清理采伐(在自然干扰后采伐木材;也称为“清理”或“卫生采伐”)很常见,但尚未对自然风干扰后的清理采伐影响木本植物更新的方式进行测试。在此,我们展示了美国田纳西州中西部中度严重风干扰三年后的研究结果。我们比较了两个未清理的地点和两个进行中度强度清理的地点。我们的方法展示了在逐个地块基础上计算累积严重程度指标,该指标将自然风倒严重程度与人为树木砍伐和清除相结合。幼苗/幼树密度和物种丰富度不受累积干扰严重程度的影响,但物种多样性随累积严重程度增加呈现边际增加。组成变化量(从干扰前的树木到干扰后的幼苗/幼树)随干扰累积严重程度显著增加,但在所研究的严重程度范围内未显示出阈值迹象。总体而言,这些地点几乎没有明显的有害变化。在这些系统中,中度严重的自然干扰后接中度强度的清理采伐可能对森林更新和多样性几乎没有不利影响;在自然和人为干扰组合且累积严重程度大得多的情况下,更可能出现生态意外和阈值组成变化。