Hill B T, Whelan R D, Hosking L K, Shellard S A, Hinds M D, Mayes J, Zwelling L A
Laboratory of Cellular Chemotherapy, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK.
Int J Cancer. 1991 Apr 1;47(6):899-902. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910470619.
Etoposide (VP-16) resistance is expressed following in vitro exposure of HN-1 and MCF-7 human tumor cells to the drug itself or to fractionated X irradiation. VP-16-selected sublines prove cross-resistant to Adriamycin, amsacrine and actinomycin D, whilst X-ray-pretreated sublines show cross-resistance to only actinomycin D. These differential responses, in the HN-1 series, are not associated with significant differences in amounts of immunoreactive topoisomerase (topo) II, altered topo-II catalytic activity of nuclear extracts or changes in susceptibility of the topo II to VP-16- or amsacrine-induced DNA-protein cross-link formation. Therefore significant modifications in topo II appear not to be implicated in VP-16 resistance in these HN-1 sublines.
将人肿瘤细胞系HN-1和MCF-7在体外暴露于依托泊苷(VP-16)本身或分次X线照射后,可产生对VP-16的耐药性。经VP-16筛选的亚系对阿霉素、安吖啶和放线菌素D具有交叉耐药性,而经X线预处理的亚系仅对放线菌素D表现出交叉耐药性。在HN-1细胞系中,这些不同的反应与免疫反应性拓扑异构酶(topo)II的量、核提取物中topo-II催化活性的改变或topo II对VP-16或安吖啶诱导的DNA-蛋白质交联形成的敏感性变化均无显著差异。因此,topo II的显著修饰似乎与这些HN-1亚系对VP-16的耐药性无关。