Doshi K B, Kashyap S R, Brennan D M, Hoar B M, Cho L, Hoogwerf B J
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, The Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Feb;11(2):102-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00908.x. Epub 2008 May 20.
It is unclear if metabolic syndrome (MS) is equal to type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and mortality, and its prognostic value compared to Framingham risk model is controversial. We assessed mortality, CVD risk and prevalence in patients with DM and those without DM who met National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) MS criteria compared to patients without DM or MS. We analysed which component(s) of NCEP MS criteria had greatest predictive value for mortality.
Retrospective cohort analysis of 1189 DM, 1241 MS (fasting glucose < 126 mg/dl and > or =3 components NCEP-ATP III criteria) and 3023 non-DM/non-MS patients presented for baseline visit to Preventive Cardiology clinic between 1995 and 2006, whose subsequent vital status was determined for a median of 5.2 years. The association with mortality was determined by Cox proportional hazards models. The incremental predictive value of MS components was performed by concordance indexes.
DM group had highest mortality and CVD prevalence vs. MS and non-DM/non-MS groups respectively (all p < or = 0.001). Patients with MS criteria had increased CVD prevalence and 1.5-fold increased mortality vs. non-DM/non-MS group (all p < 0.02). In NCEP MS criteria, only fasting glucose significantly predicted mortality in MS group (p = 0.05). MS criteria predicted CVD prevalence in a parallel manner to Framingham risk score assessment. In a cohort of patients at high risk for CVD whose risk factors are being treated, presence of diabetes in addition to plasma glucose within NCEP MS criteria strongly predicts all-cause mortality.
尚不清楚代谢综合征(MS)在预测心血管疾病(CVD)风险和死亡率方面是否等同于2型糖尿病(DM),并且其与弗雷明汉风险模型相比的预后价值存在争议。我们评估了符合美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗小组第三次报告(NCEP-ATP III)MS标准的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的死亡率、CVD风险及患病率,并与无糖尿病或MS的患者进行比较。我们分析了NCEP MS标准的哪些组成部分对死亡率具有最大预测价值。
对1995年至2006年间到预防心脏病诊所进行基线检查的1189例糖尿病患者、1241例MS患者(空腹血糖<126mg/dl且≥3项符合NCEP-ATP III标准)以及3023例非糖尿病/非MS患者进行回顾性队列分析,对其随后的生存状态进行了中位时间为5.2年的随访。通过Cox比例风险模型确定与死亡率的关联。通过一致性指数评估MS各组成部分的增量预测价值。
糖尿病组的死亡率和CVD患病率分别高于MS组和非糖尿病/非MS组(均p≤0.001)。符合MS标准的患者与非糖尿病/非MS组相比,CVD患病率增加,死亡率增加1.5倍(均p<0.02)。在NCEP MS标准中,只有空腹血糖能显著预测MS组的死亡率(p = 0.05)。MS标准预测CVD患病率的方式与弗雷明汉风险评分评估相似。在一组正在治疗心血管疾病高危因素的患者中,除了符合NCEP MS标准的血糖水平外,糖尿病的存在强烈预测全因死亡率。