Feigl Guenther Christian, Horstmann Gerhard A
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105 Suppl:91-8. doi: 10.3171/sup.2006.105.7.91.
Brain metastases are diagnosed in 20 to 40% of all cancer patients and are associated with a considerable drop in life expectancy and often also in quality of life for these patients. Several treatment options are available including surgery, chemotherapy, whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and Gamma Knife surgery (GKS). However, management of brain metastases still presents a challenge and there is no general consensus on the best treatment strategy. The aim of the authors' study was to further evaluate the efficacy of GKS in the treatment of brain metastases and to evaluate the predictive value of volumetric tumor follow-up measurement.
Consecutive patients with controlled systemic cancer and variable numbers of brain metastases were included in this prospective study. Patients with severe symptoms of brain compression underwent surgery before GKS. Each follow-up examination included a thorough neurological examination and a neuroradiological quantitative volumetric tumor analysis. A total of 300 consecutive patients (mean age 58 years) with 703 brain metastases were treated between December 1998 and October 2005. The mean total tumor volume (TTV) was 2.1 cm3. The overall local tumor control rate was 84.5%. In 79% of all treated metastases a mean TTV reduction of 84.7% was achieved using a mean prescription dose of 21.8 Gy. Only few, mostly mild, side effects were observed during the mean follow-up period of 12.7 months. The overall mean progression-free survival period was 9.4 months. There was a statistically significant difference in survival of patients with one compared with multiple metastases, regardless of the histological type and preceding treatment.
Gamma Knife surgery is a safe and effective treatment for patients with brain metastases regardless of the history of treatment and histological tumor type. It achieves excellent tumor control, significant TTV reduction without causing severe side effects, and accordingly, preserves quality of live. Volume changes after GKS did not serve as a predictor for treatment outcome and survival.
在所有癌症患者中,有20%至40%被诊断出脑转移,这会导致患者预期寿命大幅下降,生活质量往往也会降低。目前有多种治疗选择,包括手术、化疗、全脑放疗、立体定向放疗、立体定向放射外科手术和伽玛刀手术(GKS)。然而,脑转移的治疗仍然是一项挑战,对于最佳治疗策略尚无普遍共识。作者进行这项研究的目的是进一步评估GKS治疗脑转移的疗效,并评估肿瘤体积随访测量的预测价值。
本前瞻性研究纳入了系统性癌症得到控制且脑转移数量不等的连续患者。有严重脑压迫症状的患者在接受GKS之前先进行了手术。每次随访检查都包括全面的神经系统检查和神经放射学定量肿瘤体积分析。在1998年12月至2005年10月期间,共治疗了300例连续患者(平均年龄58岁),这些患者共有703处脑转移。平均总肿瘤体积(TTV)为2.1立方厘米。总体局部肿瘤控制率为84.5%。在所有接受治疗的转移灶中,79%使用平均处方剂量21.8 Gy后平均TTV减少了84.7%。在平均12.7个月的随访期内,仅观察到少数(大多为轻度)副作用。总体平均无进展生存期为9.4个月。无论组织学类型和先前治疗情况如何,单发转移与多发转移患者的生存率存在统计学显著差异。
无论治疗史和组织学肿瘤类型如何,伽玛刀手术对于脑转移患者都是一种安全有效的治疗方法。它能实现出色的肿瘤控制,显著降低TTV且不引起严重副作用,从而保留生活质量。GKS后的体积变化不能作为治疗结果和生存的预测指标。