Suppr超能文献

利用药物治疗费用筛选患者,以开展基于社区药房的药物评估项目。

Using the costs of drug therapy to screen patients for a community pharmacy-based medication review program.

作者信息

Krähenbühl Jean-Marc, Decollogny Anne, Bugnon Olivier

机构信息

Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine Department, Community Pharmacy Unit, Pharmaceutical Science Section, University of Geneva, Rue du Bugnon 44, Lausanne 1011, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pharm World Sci. 2008 Dec;30(6):816-22. doi: 10.1007/s11096-008-9232-5. Epub 2008 Jun 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To measure the positive predictive value (PPV) of the cost of drug therapy (threshold = 2000 Swiss francs [CHF], US$1440, 1360) as a screening criterion for identifying patients who may benefit from medication review (MR). To describe identified drug-related problems (DRPs) and expense problems (EPs), and to estimate potential savings if all recommendations were accepted.

SETTING

Five voluntary Swiss community pharmacies.

METHODS

Of 12,680 patients, 592 (4.7%) had drug therapy costs exceeding 2000 CHF over a six-month period from July 1 to December 31, 2002. This threshold limit was set to identify high-risk patients for DRPs and EPs. Three pharmacists consecutively conducted a medication review based on the pharmaceutical charts of 125 sampled patients who met the inclusion criterion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The PPV of a threshold of 2000 CHF for identifying patients who might benefit from a MR: true positives were patients with at least one DRP, while false positives were patients with no DRP.

RESULTS

The selection based on this criterion had a PPV of 86% for detecting patients with at least one DRP and 95% if EPs were also considered. There was a mean of 2.64 (SD = 2.20) DRPs per patient and a mean of 2.14 (SD = 1.39) EPs per patient. Of these patients, 90% were over 65 years old or were treated with at least five chronic medications, two common criteria for identifying patients at risk of DRPs. The main types of DRPs were drug-drug interactions, compliance problems and duplicate drugs. Mean daily drug cost per patient was CHF 14.87 (US$10.70, 10.10). A potential savings of CHF 1.67 (US$1.20, 1.14) per day (11%) was estimated if all recommendations to solve DRPs and EPs suggested herein were implemented.

CONCLUSION

Further studies should investigate whether the potential benefit of medication reviews in preventing DRPs and containing costs in this patient group can be confirmed in a real practice environment.

摘要

目的

衡量药物治疗费用(阈值 = 2000瑞士法郎[CHF],1440美元,1360欧元)作为筛选标准以识别可能从药物治疗评估(MR)中获益的患者的阳性预测值(PPV)。描述识别出的药物相关问题(DRP)和费用问题(EP),并估计若所有建议均被采纳可能节省的费用。

设置

瑞士五家志愿社区药房。

方法

在12680名患者中,592名(4.7%)在2002年7月1日至12月31日的六个月期间药物治疗费用超过2000 CHF。设定此阈值以识别DRP和EP的高危患者。三名药剂师连续对125名符合纳入标准的抽样患者的药房记录进行药物治疗评估。

主要结局指标

2000 CHF阈值用于识别可能从MR中获益的患者的PPV:真阳性为至少有一个DRP的患者,假阳性为无DRP的患者。

结果

基于该标准的筛选对于检测至少有一个DRP的患者的PPV为86%,若同时考虑EP则为95%。每位患者平均有2.64个(标准差 = 2.20)DRP,每位患者平均有2.14个(标准差 = 1.39)EP。这些患者中,90%年龄超过65岁或接受至少五种慢性药物治疗,这是识别DRP风险患者的两个常见标准。DRP的主要类型为药物相互作用、依从性问题和重复用药。每位患者的日均药物费用为14.87 CHF(10.70美元,10.10欧元)。若实施本文提出的所有解决DRP和EP的建议,估计每天可节省1.67 CHF(1.20美元,1.14欧元)(11%)。

结论

进一步的研究应调查在实际临床环境中是否能证实药物治疗评估在预防DRP和控制该患者群体费用方面的潜在益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验