Harris Tyler J, Blackmore C Craig, Mirza Sohail K, Jurkovich Gregory J
School of Medicine, University of Washington, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1547-53. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817926c1.
Retrospective cohort study.
To determine the frequency of injuries missed by initial computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine in obtunded blunt trauma victims.
Optimal method for excluding cervical spine injury in obtunded trauma patients remains controversial. Trauma centers show marked variation in spine clearance protocols.
We reviewed medical records of consecutive obtunded blunt trauma victims admitted over 2 years to a level 1 trauma center and selected patients who had CT imaging of the cervical spine during their initial emergency room evaluation. We excluded patients in whom this study identified an injury and also patients who became examinable before subsequent imaging with upright cervical spine radiographs, as required by institutional protocol. Using composite reference standard of cervical injury diagnosed by subsequent imaging or clinical examinations by the time of discharge from the hospital, we evaluated the frequency and type of injuries missed by the initial CT and the delay in spine clearance due to additional imaging.
Of 590 screened patients, 367 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study cohort had mean age 40.2 years (SD 20.8), 75.5% males, mean Glasgow Coma Scale score 5.9 (SD 3.4), and mean Injury Severity Scale score 24.5 (SD 10). Initial CT imaging failed to identify an injury in 1 patient, for a false negative rate of 0.3% (1/367): a cervical cord contusion identified on subsequent physical examination, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, and managed nonoperatively. Upright cervical spine radiographs did not identify any injuries missed by CT, but they delayed spine clearance by a mean of 2.6 days and by more than 48 hours in 42% of the patients.
Initial CT imaging identified all unstable cervical spine injuries in obtunded trauma patients. Subsequent upright radiographs did not identify any additional injuries but significantly delayed spine clearance.
回顾性队列研究。
确定钝性创伤昏迷患者初次颈椎计算机断层扫描(CT)漏诊损伤的频率。
钝性创伤患者排除颈椎损伤的最佳方法仍存在争议。创伤中心的脊柱清除方案存在显著差异。
我们回顾了连续两年入住一级创伤中心的钝性创伤昏迷患者的病历,并选择了在初次急诊室评估期间进行颈椎CT成像的患者。根据机构方案要求,我们排除了本研究中发现有损伤的患者以及在后续颈椎正位X线片成像前可进行检查的患者。使用出院时通过后续成像或临床检查诊断的颈椎损伤的综合参考标准,我们评估了初次CT漏诊损伤的频率和类型以及因额外成像导致的脊柱清除延迟。
在590例筛查患者中,367例符合纳入和排除标准。研究队列的平均年龄为40.2岁(标准差20.8),男性占75.5%,格拉斯哥昏迷量表平均评分为5.9(标准差3.4),损伤严重程度评分平均为24.5(标准差10)。初次CT成像未发现1例患者有损伤,假阴性率为0.3%(1/367):后续体格检查发现颈椎脊髓挫伤,经磁共振成像证实,非手术治疗。颈椎正位X线片未发现CT漏诊的任何损伤,但它们使脊柱清除平均延迟2.6天,42%的患者延迟超过48小时。
初次CT成像可识别钝性创伤患者所有不稳定的颈椎损伤。后续正位X线片未发现任何额外损伤,但显著延迟了脊柱清除。