Suppr超能文献

用于评估脊髓损伤儿童胸腰骶矫形器佩戴时间的依从性监测器的有效性。

The validity of compliance monitors to assess wearing time of thoracic-lumbar-sacral orthoses in children with spinal cord injury.

作者信息

Hunter Louis N, Sison-Williamson Mitell, Mendoza Melissa M, McDonald Craig M, Molitor Fred, Mulcahey M J, Betz Randal R, Vogel Lawrence C, Bagley Anita

机构信息

Shriners Hospitals for Children Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1554-61. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318178864e.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective multicenter observation.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the validity of 3 commercially available at recording thoracic-lumbar-sacral orthosis (TLSO) wearing time of children with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess each monitor's function during daily activities.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A major limitation to studies assessing the effectiveness of spinal prophylactic bracing is the patient's compliance with the prescribed wearing time. Although some studies have begun to use objective compliance monitors, there is little documentation of the validity of the monitors during activities of daily life and no comparisons of available monitors.

METHODS

Fifteen children with SCI who wore a TLSO for paralytic scoliosis were observed for 4 days during their rehabilitation stay. Three compliance monitors (2 temperature and 1 pressure sensitive) were mounted onto each TLSO. Time of brace wear from the monitors was compared with the wear time per day recorded in diaries.

RESULTS

Observed versus monitored duration of brace wear found the HOBO (temperature sensitive) to be the most valid compliance monitor. The HOBO had the lowest average of difference and variance of difference scores. The correlation between the recorded daily entries and monitored brace wear time was also highest for the HOBO in analysis of dependent and independent scores. Bland-Altman plots showed that the pressure sensitive monitor underestimated wear time whereas the temperature monitors overestimated wear time.

CONCLUSION

Compliance to prescribed wearing schedule has been a barrier to studying TLSO efficacy. All 3 monitors were found to measure TLSO compliance, but the 2 temperature monitors were more in agreement with the daily diaries. Based on its functional advantages compared with the HOBO, the StowAway TidbiT will be used to further investigate the long-term compliance of TLSO bracing in children with SCI.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性多中心观察研究。

目的

确定三种市售的用于记录脊髓损伤(SCI)儿童胸腰骶矫形器(TLSO)佩戴时间的设备的有效性,并评估每个监测器在日常活动中的功能。

背景数据总结

评估脊柱预防性支具有效性的研究的一个主要限制是患者对规定佩戴时间的依从性。尽管一些研究已经开始使用客观的依从性监测器,但关于这些监测器在日常生活活动中的有效性的文献很少,也没有对现有监测器进行比较。

方法

在15名因麻痹性脊柱侧弯佩戴TLSO的SCI儿童康复期间,对他们进行了4天的观察。在每个TLSO上安装了三种依从性监测器(2种温度监测器和1种压力敏感监测器)。将监测器记录的支具佩戴时间与日记中记录的每日佩戴时间进行比较。

结果

观察到的与监测到的支具佩戴持续时间对比发现,HOBO(温度敏感型)是最有效的依从性监测器。HOBO的平均差异和差异分数的方差最低。在相关和独立分数分析中,HOBO记录的每日条目与监测到的支具佩戴时间之间的相关性也最高。Bland-Altman图显示,压力敏感监测器低估了佩戴时间,而温度监测器高估了佩戴时间。

结论

对规定佩戴时间表的依从性一直是研究TLSO疗效的障碍。发现所有三种监测器都能测量TLSO的依从性,但两种温度监测器与每日日记的一致性更高。基于与HOBO相比的功能优势,StowAway TidbiT将用于进一步研究SCI儿童TLSO支具的长期依从性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验