Haigh Julian R, Lefkowitz Lee J, Capacio Benedict R, Doctor Bhupendra P, Gordon Richard K
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Division of Biochemistry, Silver Spring, MD 20910-7500, USA.
Chem Biol Interact. 2008 Sep 25;175(1-3):417-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.04.032. Epub 2008 May 3.
Red blood cell AChE (RBC-AChE) and plasma BChE can be used as sensitive biomarkers to detect exposure to OP nerve agents, pesticides, and cholinergic drugs. In a comparative study, RBC-AChE and serum BChE activities in whole blood was obtained from forty seven healthy male and female human volunteers, and then exposed separately ex vivo to three OP nerve agents (soman (GD), sarin (GB) and VX) to generate a wide range of inhibition of AChE and BChE activity (up to 90% of control). These samples were measured using four different ChE assays: (i) colorimetric microEllman (using DTNB at 412 nm), (ii) Test-mate ChE field kit (also based on the Ellman assay), (iii) Michel (delta pH), and (iv) the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Whole Blood (WRAIR WB) cholinesterase assay. The WRAIR assay is a modified Ellman method using DTP at 324 nm (which minimizes hemoglobin interference and improves sensitivity), and determines AChE and BChE in a small whole blood sample simultaneously. Scatter plots of RBC-AChE activities were determined using the WRAIR ChE assay versus the micro-Ellman, Test-mate and Michel after exposure to varying concentrations of soman, sarin and VX. Regression analyses yielded mostly linear relationships with high correlations (r2 = 0.83-0.93) for RBC-AChE values in the WRAIR assay compared to the alternate methods. For the plasma BChE measurements, individual human values were significantly more variable (as expected), resulting in lower correlations using WRAIR ChE versus the alternate assays (r2 values 0.5 - 0.6). To circumvent the limitations of simple correlation analysis, Bland and Altman analysis for comparing two independent measurement techniques was performed. For example, a Bland and Altman plot of the ratio of the WRAIR whole blood AChE and Michel AChE (plotted on the y-axis) vs. the average of the two methods (x-axis) shows that the majority of the individual AChE values are within +/- 1.96 S.D. of the mean difference, indicating that the two methods may be used interchangeably with a high degree of confidence. The WRAIR ChE assay can be thus be used as a reliable inter-conversion assay when comparing results from laboratory-based (Michel) and field-based (Test-mate ChE kit), which use different methodology and report in different units of AChE activity.
红细胞乙酰胆碱酯酶(RBC - AChE)和血浆丁酰胆碱酯酶(BChE)可作为敏感的生物标志物,用于检测有机磷神经毒剂、杀虫剂和胆碱能药物的暴露情况。在一项对比研究中,从47名健康男女志愿者身上获取全血中的RBC - AChE和血清BChE活性,然后将其离体分别暴露于三种有机磷神经毒剂(梭曼(GD)、沙林(GB)和VX),以产生对AChE和BChE活性的广泛抑制(高达对照的90%)。使用四种不同的胆碱酯酶检测方法对这些样本进行测量:(i)比色法微埃尔曼法(在412 nm处使用5,5'-二硫代双(2-硝基苯甲酸)(DTNB)),(ii)Test - mate胆碱酯酶现场检测试剂盒(也基于埃尔曼检测法),(iii)米歇尔法(ΔpH),以及(iv)沃尔特·里德陆军研究所全血胆碱酯酶检测法(WRAIR WB检测法)。WRAIR检测法是一种改良的埃尔曼法,在324 nm处使用二硫代苏糖醇(DTP)(可最大程度减少血红蛋白干扰并提高灵敏度),并能同时测定小份全血样本中的AChE和BChE。在暴露于不同浓度的梭曼、沙林和VX后,使用WRAIR胆碱酯酶检测法与微埃尔曼法、Test - mate法和米歇尔法测定RBC - AChE活性的散点图。回归分析表明,与其他方法相比,WRAIR检测法中RBC - AChE值大多呈线性关系且相关性较高(r2 = 0.83 - 0.93)。对于血浆BChE测量,个体人类值的变异性明显更大(正如预期),导致WRAIR胆碱酯酶检测法与其他检测法的相关性较低(r2值为0.5 - 0.6)。为规避简单相关性分析的局限性,进行了用于比较两种独立测量技术的布兰德 - 奥特曼分析。例如,WRAIR全血AChE与米歇尔AChE比值(绘制在y轴上)相对于两种方法平均值(x轴)的布兰德 - 奥特曼图表明,大多数个体AChE值在平均差异的±1.96标准差范围内,这表明两种方法可以高度自信地互换使用。因此,在比较基于实验室的(米歇尔法)和基于现场的(Test - mate胆碱酯酶试剂盒)结果时,WRAIR胆碱酯酶检测法可作为一种可靠的相互转换检测法,这两种方法使用不同的方法且以不同的AChE活性单位报告结果。