Bianco Giuliana, Novario Giuseppe, Bochicchio Dominga, Anzilotta Giuseppe, Palma Achille, Cataldi Tommaso R I
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Via N. Sauro, 85-85100 Potenza, Italy.
Chemosphere. 2008 Aug;73(1):104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.086. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
We present and compare results obtained from the analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) of a limited number of contaminated soil samples collected in three areas of Basilicata region (south of Italy). The levels of PCBs were evaluated by using two analytical methods: (i) parallel dual-column gas-chromatography with dual electron capture detectors (GC-ECD) and (ii) gas-chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS) via electron impact ionization (EI) in the multiple ion monitoring mode (MIM, two ions per compound). Two extraction methods prior to sample cleanup were also examined: microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE). The MAE was the extraction procedure adopted using acetone/n-hexane (1:1, v/v) as it is mainly characterized by higher sample throughput and allowed reduced consumption of organic solvents. While extraction and analysis of spiked soil samples showed the applicability of both methods, systematic differences between the results were obtained for the sum of PCBs as a result of some non-detected congeners by GC-ECD compared with GC-HRMS. Indeed, high resolution MS using EI mode (electron energy 40eV) with a resolving power of 10,000 provides additional information about the contamination pattern. The GC-ECD screening of 11 soil samples led to just one sample non-compliant to as it was close to the guide value for soils fixed by the Italian legislation (i.e., 60ppb for private or urban soil). Using GC-HRMS, the amount of all PCBs found ranged from 5.4 to 127ppb with five soil samples non-compliant to the guide value. The number of identified congeners ranged from 1 to 9 and 9 to 18 using dual-column GC-ECD and GC-HRMS, respectively.
我们展示并比较了对意大利南部巴西利卡塔地区三个区域采集的有限数量污染土壤样本中的多氯联苯(PCBs)进行分析所获得的结果。通过两种分析方法评估多氯联苯的含量:(i)配备双电子捕获检测器的平行双柱气相色谱法(GC-ECD),以及(ii)在多离子监测模式(MIM,每种化合物两个离子)下通过电子轰击电离(EI)与高分辨率质谱联用的气相色谱法(GC-HRMS)。还研究了样品净化前的两种提取方法:微波辅助萃取(MAE)和超声辅助萃取(UAE)。采用丙酮/正己烷(1:1,v/v)的微波辅助萃取是所采用的提取程序,其主要特点是样品通量更高,且有机溶剂消耗减少。虽然加标土壤样本的萃取和分析表明两种方法均适用,但由于气相色谱 - 电子捕获检测器(GC-ECD)与气相色谱 - 高分辨率质谱(GC-HRMS)相比存在一些未检测到的同系物,导致多氯联苯总量的结果存在系统差异。实际上,使用EI模式(电子能量40eV)、分辨率为10000的高分辨率质谱提供了有关污染模式的更多信息。对11个土壤样本进行气相色谱 - 电子捕获检测器筛查,只有一个样本不符合要求,因为它接近意大利法规规定的土壤指导值(即私人或城市土壤为60ppb)。使用气相色谱 - 高分辨率质谱法,发现的所有多氯联苯含量范围为5.4至127ppb,有五个土壤样本不符合指导值。使用双柱气相色谱 - 电子捕获检测器和气相色谱 - 高分辨率质谱分别鉴定出的同系物数量范围为1至9个和9至18个。