Cutcliffe John R, Wieck K Lynn
University of Texas (Tyler), Tyler, TX 75799, USA.
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Jul;16(5):499-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00894.x.
This paper will deconstruct the rationale(s) for aspiring to professional status in nursing.
It is argued that 'transformative nursing leaders' must transition from operational to strategic aspects, such as considering the question of whether or not nursing should move towards professional status.
This paper examines documented outcomes arising out of professional status and considers whether or not these are contrary to the central tenets of nursing's underpinning philosophy and practice axioms. The outcomes scrutinized are: compensation, respect and recognition, political influence and clout, the consumer movement and the gender issue.
A carte blanche aspiration for professional status is irreconcilable with some of nursing's central tenets. However, there are benefits that nurses should pursue.
Aspiring to professional status by adopting the normative orthodoxies and dominant discourse of our medical colleagues actually serves to reinforce and maintain nurses in a mostly subservient role.
In place of adopting the gendered views of professional status, nurses and clients might be better served by the creation of a parallel discourse; one where the central and underpinning values of nurses and clients are seen as equal, though different to the values of the current dominant discourse.
本文将剖析追求护理专业地位的理由。
有人认为,“变革型护理领导者”必须从运营层面过渡到战略层面,比如思考护理是否应迈向专业地位这一问题。
本文审视了专业地位所带来的已记录成果,并考量这些成果是否与护理基础理念和实践公理的核心原则相悖。所审视的成果包括:薪酬、尊重与认可、政治影响力和权势、消费者运动以及性别问题。
对专业地位的无条件追求与护理的一些核心原则无法协调一致。然而,护士应追求其中的益处。
通过采纳我们医学同行的规范性正统观念和主导性话语来追求专业地位,实际上会强化并使护士大多维持在从属地位。
相较于采纳关于专业地位的性别化观点,创建一种平行话语或许能更好地服务于护士和患者;在这种话语中,护士和患者的核心及基础价值观虽与当前主导话语的价值观不同,但被视为平等。