Liao Xing, Xie Yan-ming
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008 Jun;6(6):555-60. doi: 10.3736/jcim20080602.
For a long time, in the field of medical research, due to lack of proper methods, research decision-making process has not made the most of human experience, recommendations and different opinions, viewpoints, and expositions related to subjective interpretation. At present, this problem in the course of the standardized clinical research on traditional Chinese medicine is particularly prominent and needs to be solved urgently. Consensus methods can be used for studying different perspectives within the group and get different levels of "consent" in order to achieve "consensus", especially in the formation of a consensus of experts, which are widely used now. Consensus methods include three frequently used methods such as Delphi method, nominal group technique and consensus development conference. The research team of WHO Western Pacific Regional Primary Osteoporosis Clinical Practice Guideline of Traditional Medicine completed the preparation of good practice points in the first draft after three expert consensus meetings by using consensus development conference method. This article discusses the application of consensus development conference method in the developing process of clinical practice guidelines of traditional medicine.
长期以来,在医学研究领域,由于缺乏适当的方法,研究决策过程未能充分利用人类经验、建议以及与主观解释相关的不同意见、观点和阐述。目前,这一问题在中医药标准化临床研究过程中尤为突出,亟待解决。共识方法可用于研究群体内的不同观点,并获得不同程度的“同意”以达成“共识”,尤其是在形成专家共识方面,目前被广泛应用。共识方法包括三种常用方法,即德尔菲法、名义群体技术和共识发展会议。世界卫生组织西太平洋区域传统医学原发性骨质疏松症临床实践指南研究团队通过共识发展会议方法,经过三次专家共识会议完成了初稿中良好实践要点的制定。本文探讨共识发展会议方法在传统医学临床实践指南制定过程中的应用。