Shanks J H, Anderson N H, McCluggage G, Toner P G
Queen's University Department of Pathology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
IARC Sci Publ. 1991(112):115-24.
A report on the pilot study of the Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths was published recently in the United Kingdom. The scheme was designed as a specialized form of clinical audit relating to perioperative patient care. Because the report placed little emphasis on autopsy, we have looked at all autopsied perioperative deaths, as defined by the enquiry, over a three-year period (1986-88) in a defined catchment area of Northern Ireland. Class I major discrepancies of diagnosis between clinical and postmortem records were found in 21% of 213 autopsied perioperative deaths. By definition, these represented instances in which an adverse impact on patient survival had resulted from the discrepancy. In an additional 29% of cases, there were Class II major discrepancies, which were discrepancies in the primary diagnosis not relevant to life-saving treatment. In 30% of cases there was a discrepancy in a secondary diagnosis, which might have affected the eventual prognosis, had the patient survived, but which was not related directly to the cause of death; these were termed Class III discrepancies. In 47% of cases, there were Class IV discrepant secondary diagnoses, which were 'incidental' findings and had no bearing on prognosis. To put these findings in context, the autopsy rate in Northern Ireland was 12% in 1987, with a higher rate (23%) in the two main teaching hospitals and a lower rate (8%) in all other hospitals. The rate of coroner's autopsies, 6%, is uniform throughout Northern Ireland. Coroner's autopsies are carried out mostly by the salaried staff of the State Pathologist's department. The observed differences in the rates of hospital autopsies reflect local deficiencies of pathologists in relation to the work load. In a series of consecutive autopsies carried out at one of the main teaching hospitals, the highest autopsy rate (68%) was found for paediatric patients, with rates of 29% for surgical and 23% for medical cases. The proportion of hospital autopsies carried out in perioperative surgical patients was the same as that for medical patients, reflecting the fact that no particular emphasis is placed on use of the autopsy as a form of clinical audit for the perioperative group.
一份关于围手术期死亡机密调查的初步研究报告最近在英国发表。该计划被设计为一种与围手术期患者护理相关的特殊临床审计形式。由于该报告几乎没有强调尸检,我们研究了北爱尔兰一个特定集水区在三年期间(1986 - 1988年)按照调查定义的所有围手术期尸检死亡病例。在213例围手术期尸检死亡病例中,21%发现临床记录与尸检记录之间存在I类主要诊断差异。根据定义,这些代表了差异对患者生存产生不利影响的情况。在另外29%的病例中,存在II类主要差异,即主要诊断中的差异与挽救生命的治疗无关。在30%的病例中,次要诊断存在差异,这可能会影响患者存活后的最终预后,但与死亡原因无直接关系;这些被称为III类差异。在47%的病例中,存在IV类次要诊断差异,即“偶然”发现且与预后无关。为了更好地理解这些发现,北爱尔兰1987年的尸检率为12%,两所主要教学医院的尸检率较高(23%),其他所有医院的尸检率较低(8%)。验尸官进行尸检的比例为6%,在北爱尔兰各地是统一的。验尸官的尸检大多由国家病理学家部门的受薪工作人员进行。观察到的医院尸检率差异反映了病理学家在工作量方面的当地不足。在一所主要教学医院进行的一系列连续尸检中,儿科患者的尸检率最高(68%),外科病例为29%,内科病例为23%。围手术期外科患者进行医院尸检的比例与内科患者相同,这反映出对于围手术期群体,并没有特别强调将尸检作为一种临床审计形式。