Rossi S, Reale D, Grandi E
Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histology, University of Ferrara, Italy.
IARC Sci Publ. 1991(112):99-108.
We investigated 110 cases, selected at random out of the total of 1876 autopsies performed in the Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histology at the University of Ferrara-Arcispedale Santa Anna on patients who had died at the hospital during 1983-87. Clinical data were taken from 'necropsy request forms' filled in by clinicians and from medical records. We then evaluated the extent of agreement and disagreement, expressed as underdiagnosis (false-negative) and overdiagnosis (false-positive), between the clinical and pathological records with regard to primary disease and to cause of death. Agreement between the diagnoses was 81% for primary disease and 58% for cause of death. The diagnoses of neoplastic, cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases showed the closest agreement. Among the neoplasms, those of the liver, gall-bladder, pancreas, retroperitoneal space and prostate were most often overlooked in clinical diagnoses. We had conflicting results for cancer of the lung and of the colon-rectum, for which there was a high level of agreement, but also a large number of false-positive cases and cases in which they were found by chance at autopsy. For cerebrovascular diseases, false-negative and false-positive diagnoses were seen most often for cause of death. With regard to cardiovascular diseases, a relatively uniform distribution was found for myocardial infarction among the three categories, and a high rate of agreement was found for pulmonary embolism. Of all diseases, bronchopneumonia was associated with the highest percentage of false-negative diagnoses for cause of death. Our data on digestive diseases show the strongest agreement on diagnosis of primary disease in relation to cirrhosis of the liver; a high rate of agreement on cause of death was confirmed for alimentary bleeding. Active tuberculosis was detected only at autopsy. We conclude that autopsy is a valid tool for investigation, despite the availability of sophisticated diagnostic techniques.
我们调查了110例病例,这些病例是从费拉拉大学-圣安娜医院病理解剖与组织学研究所1983年至1987年期间在该医院死亡的患者所进行的总计1876例尸检中随机选取的。临床数据取自临床医生填写的“尸检申请表”以及病历。然后,我们评估了临床记录与病理记录在原发性疾病和死因方面的诊断一致程度和不一致程度,分别以漏诊(假阴性)和误诊(假阳性)表示。原发性疾病的诊断一致性为81%,死因的诊断一致性为58%。肿瘤、脑血管和心血管疾病的诊断显示出最接近的一致性。在肿瘤中,肝脏、胆囊、胰腺、腹膜后间隙和前列腺的肿瘤在临床诊断中最常被漏诊。我们对于肺癌和结直肠癌的结果存在矛盾,这两种癌症的诊断一致性较高,但也有大量假阳性病例以及在尸检时偶然发现的病例。对于脑血管疾病,死因的假阴性和假阳性诊断最为常见。关于心血管疾病,心肌梗死在这三类中的分布相对均匀,肺栓塞的诊断一致性较高。在所有疾病中,支气管肺炎与死因的假阴性诊断比例最高相关。我们关于消化系统疾病的数据显示,在原发性疾病诊断方面,与肝硬化的诊断一致性最强;对于消化道出血,死因的诊断一致性较高得到了证实。活动性肺结核仅在尸检时被发现。我们得出结论,尽管有先进的诊断技术,但尸检仍是一种有效的调查工具。