Sebban Catherine, Brice Pauline, Delarue Richard, Haioun Corinne, Souleau Bertrand, Mounier Nicolas, Brousse Nicole, Feugier Pierre, Tilly Hervé, Solal-Céligny Philippe, Coiffier Bertrand
Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3614-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.5358. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
The treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma has changed with the introduction of high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem-cell transplant then with rituximab. The effect of these two strategies on the outcome of relapsing patients with follicular lymphoma has never been compared.
We analyzed two cohorts of patients treated in two successive randomized studies with the same treatment, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, teniposide, and prednisolone plus interferon, to evaluate the role of rituximab and HDT in salvage therapy after first disease progression or relapse.
Of the 364 patients included in these two studies, 254 progressed or relapsed and constitute the population of this analysis. Among them, 98 had been treated with HDT, including 33 of them after rituximab-containing salvage regimen, and 69 with rituximab alone or combined with chemotherapy but without HDT. Patients' characteristics at diagnosis were similar in all subgroups. If event-free survival was identical for patients treated within Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) -86 or GELF-94 studies, overall survival was longer in GELF-94 study. HDT was associated with a statistically significant benefit in terms of event-free survival from relapse and survival after relapse (SAR). Rituximab was associated with a greater benefit than HDT for these two end points. When both treatments were combined, patients treated with rituximab-containing salvage regimen followed by HDT had 5-year SAR more than 90%.
In follicular lymphoma, for patients treated with first-line chemotherapy the combination of a salvage regimen containing rituximab with or without HDT leads to a dramatic improvement of long-term outcome.
随着高剂量疗法(HDT)联合自体干细胞移植以及利妥昔单抗的引入,滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的治疗方式发生了改变。这两种策略对滤泡性淋巴瘤复发患者预后的影响从未被比较过。
我们分析了两组在两项连续的随机研究中接受相同治疗(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、替尼泊苷、泼尼松龙加干扰素)的患者,以评估利妥昔单抗和HDT在首次疾病进展或复发后的挽救治疗中的作用。
在这两项研究纳入的364例患者中,254例出现进展或复发,构成了本分析的人群。其中,98例接受了HDT治疗,包括33例在含利妥昔单抗的挽救方案后接受HDT治疗,69例仅接受利妥昔单抗或联合化疗但未接受HDT治疗。所有亚组患者诊断时的特征相似。如果在滤泡性淋巴瘤研究组(GELF)-86或GELF-94研究中接受治疗的患者无事件生存期相同,那么GELF-94研究中的总生存期更长。HDT在复发后的无事件生存期和复发后生存期(SAR)方面具有统计学意义的益处。对于这两个终点,利妥昔单抗比HDT具有更大的益处。当两种治疗联合使用时,接受含利妥昔单抗的挽救方案后再接受HDT治疗的患者5年SAR超过90%。
在滤泡性淋巴瘤中,对于接受一线化疗的患者,含或不含HDT的含利妥昔单抗的挽救方案联合使用可显著改善长期预后。