Suppr超能文献

乳腺断层合成系统中一种非晶硒数字乳腺摄影探测器的成像性能

Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.

作者信息

Zhao Bo, Zhao Wei

机构信息

Department of Radiology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, L-4 Health Science Center, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8460, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2008 May;35(5):1978-87. doi: 10.1118/1.2903425.

Abstract

In breast tomosynthesis a rapid sequence of N images is acquired when the x-ray tube sweeps through different angular views with respect to the breast. Since the total dose to the breast is kept the same as that in regular mammography, the exposure used for each image of tomosynthesis is 1/N. The low dose and high frame rate pose a tremendous challenge to the imaging performance of digital mammography detectors. The purpose of the present work is to investigate the detector performance in different operational modes designed for tomosynthesis acquisition, e.g., binning or full resolution readout, the range of view angles, and the number of views N. A prototype breast tomosynthesis system with a nominal angular range of +/-25 degrees was used in our investigation. The system was equipped with an amorphous selenium (a-Se) full field digital mammography detector with pixel size of 85 microm. The detector can be read out in full resolution or 2 x 1 binning (binning in the tube travel direction). The focal spot blur due to continuous tube travel was measured for different acquisition geometries, and it was found that pixel binning, instead of focal spot blur, dominates the detector modulation transfer function (MTF). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of the detector were measured with the exposure range of 0.4-6 mR, which is relevant to the low dose used in tomosynthesis. It was found that DQE at 0.4 mR is only 20% less than that at highest exposure for both detector readout modes. The detector temporal performance was categorized as lag and ghosting, both of which were measured as a function of x-ray exposure. The first frame lags were 8% and 4%, respectively, for binning and full resolution mode. Ghosting is negligible and independent of the frame rate. The results showed that the detector performance is x-ray quantum noise limited at the low exposures used in each view of tomosynthesis, and the temporal performance at high frame rate (up to 2 frames per second) is adequate for tomosynthesis.

摘要

在乳腺断层合成中,当X射线管相对于乳房扫过不同的角度视图时,会快速采集N幅图像序列。由于乳房的总剂量保持与常规乳腺摄影相同,因此断层合成的每幅图像所使用的曝光量为1/N。低剂量和高帧率对数字乳腺摄影探测器的成像性能构成了巨大挑战。本研究的目的是研究探测器在为断层合成采集设计的不同操作模式下的性能,例如合并或全分辨率读出、视角范围以及视图数量N。我们的研究使用了一个标称角度范围为±25度的乳腺断层合成系统原型。该系统配备了一个像素尺寸为85微米的非晶硒(a-Se)全场数字乳腺摄影探测器。探测器可以全分辨率读出或2×1合并(在管行进方向上合并)。针对不同的采集几何结构测量了由于管连续行进导致的焦点模糊,发现像素合并而非焦点模糊主导了探测器调制传递函数(MTF)。在0.4 - 6 mR的曝光范围内测量了探测器的噪声功率谱(NPS)和探测量子效率(DQE),该曝光范围与断层合成中使用的低剂量相关。发现在两种探测器读出模式下,0.4 mR时的DQE仅比最高曝光时低20%。探测器的时间性能分为滞后和重影,两者均作为X射线曝光的函数进行测量。合并模式和全分辨率模式下的第一帧滞后分别为8%和4%。重影可忽略不计且与帧率无关。结果表明,在断层合成的每个视图所使用的低曝光下,探测器性能受X射线量子噪声限制,并且高帧率(高达每秒2帧)下的时间性能足以满足断层合成的需求。

相似文献

2
Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5219-32. doi: 10.1118/1.2996014.
3
A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.
Med Phys. 2007 Mar;34(3):1098-109. doi: 10.1118/1.2558160.
7
10
Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
Med Phys. 2009 Apr;36(4):1199-207. doi: 10.1118/1.3090889.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel method to determine recursive filtration and noise reduction in fluoroscopic imaging - a comparison of four different vendors.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jan;22(1):281-292. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13115. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
3
Objective assessment of task performance: a comparison of two FFDM detectors using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Oct;6(4):043503. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.4.043503. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
Non-stationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: I. Point spread function.
Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):494-504. doi: 10.1002/mp.13313. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
Virtual assessment of stereoscopic viewing of digital breast tomosynthesis projection images.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jan;5(1):015501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.015501. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
7
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):663-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015141303.
9
Characterization of a high-energy in-line phase contrast tomosynthesis prototype.
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2404-20. doi: 10.1118/1.4917227.

本文引用的文献

1
A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11(1):34-9. doi: 10.1109/42.126908.
2
Digital mammography: novel applications.
Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;45(5):831-43, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.005.
3
A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.
Med Phys. 2007 Mar;34(3):1098-109. doi: 10.1118/1.2558160.
5
6
Voting strategy for artifact reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Med Phys. 2006 Jul;33(7):2461-71. doi: 10.1118/1.2207127.
7
Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I.
Med Phys. 2006 Mar;33(3):719-36. doi: 10.1118/1.2163407.
8
Full-field breast tomosynthesis.
Radiol Manage. 2005 Sep-Oct;27(5):25-31.
9
Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
Med Phys. 2005 Jun;32(6):1684-95. doi: 10.1118/1.1921667.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验