Suppr超能文献

使用解剖学射束方向优化算法改善调强放射治疗

Improving intensity-modulated radiation therapy using the anatomic beam orientation optimization algorithm.

作者信息

Potrebko Peter S, McCurdy Boyd M C, Butler James B, El-Gubtan Adel S

机构信息

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2008 May;35(5):2170-9. doi: 10.1118/1.2905026.

Abstract

A novel, anatomic beam orientation optimization (A-BOO) algorithm is proposed to significantly improve conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The A-BOO algorithm vectorially analyses polygonal surface mesh data of contoured patient anatomy. Five optimal (5-opt) deliverable beam orientations are selected based on (1) tangential orientation bisecting the target and adjacent organ's-at-risk (OARs) to produce precipitous dose gradients between them and (2) parallel incidence with polygon features of the target volume to facilitate conformal coverage. The 5-opt plans were compared to standard five, seven, and nine equiangular-spaced beam plans (5-equi, 7-equi, 9-equi) for: (1) gastric, (2) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) P-0126 prostate, and (3) RTOG H-0022 oropharyngeal (stage-III, IV) cancer patients. In the gastric case, the noncoplanar 5-opt plan reduced the right kidney V 20 Gy by 32.2%, 23.2%, and 20.6% compared to plans with five, seven, and nine equiangular-spaced beams. In the prostate case, the coplanar 5-opt plan produced similar rectal sparing as the 7-equi and 9-equi plans with a reduction of the V 75, V 70, V 65, and V 60 Gy of 2.4%, 5.3%, 7.0%, and 9.5% compared to the 5-equi plan. In the stage-III and IV oropharyngeal cases, the noncoplanar 5-opt plan substantially reduced the V 30 Gy and mean dose to the contralateral parotid compared to plans with five, seven, and nine equiangular-spaced beams: (stage-III) 7.1%, 5.2%, 6.8%, and 5.1, 3.5, 3.7 Gy and (stage-IV) 10.2%, 10.2%, 9.8% and 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 Gy. The geometry-based A-BOO algorithm has been demonstrated to be robust for application to a variety of IMRT treatment sites. Beam orientations producing significant improvements in OAR sparing over conventional IMRT can be automatically produced in minutes compared to hours with existing dose-based beam orientation optimization methods.

摘要

提出了一种新型的解剖学射束方向优化(A-BOO)算法,以显著改进传统的调强放射治疗(IMRT)。A-BOO算法对轮廓化的患者解剖结构的多边形表面网格数据进行矢量分析。基于以下两点选择五个最佳(5-opt)可递送射束方向:(1)切向方向平分靶区和相邻危及器官(OARs),以在它们之间产生陡峭的剂量梯度;(2)与靶区体积的多边形特征平行入射,以促进适形覆盖。将5-opt计划与标准的五个、七个和九个等角间隔射束计划(5-equi、7-equi、9-equi)进行比较,用于:(1)胃癌,(2)放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)P-0126前列腺癌,以及(3)RTOG H-0022口咽癌(III期、IV期)患者。在胃癌病例中,与具有五个、七个和九个等角间隔射束的计划相比,非共面5-opt计划使右肾V 20 Gy分别降低了32.2%、23.2%和20.6%。在前列腺癌病例中,共面5-opt计划产生的直肠保护效果与7-equi和9-equi计划相似,与5-equi计划相比,V 75、V 70、V 65和V 60 Gy分别降低了2.4%、5.3%、7.0%和9.5%。在III期和IV期口咽癌病例中,与具有五个、七个和九个等角间隔射束的计划相比,非共面5-opt计划显著降低了V 30 Gy以及对侧腮腺的平均剂量:(III期)分别降低7.1%、5.2%、6.8%,以及5.1、3.5、3.7 Gy;(IV期)分别降低10.2%、10.2%、9.8%,以及7.0、7.1、7.2 Gy。基于几何的A-BOO算法已被证明在应用于各种IMRT治疗部位时具有鲁棒性。与现有的基于剂量的射束方向优化方法需要数小时相比,能够在数分钟内自动生成在OAR保护方面比传统IMRT有显著改善的射束方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验