Suppr超能文献

维持骨细胞存活:将克氏针钻入骨内与锤入骨内的比较。

Keeping osteocytes alive: a comparison of drilling and hammering k-wires into bone.

作者信息

Franssen B B G M, van Diest P J, Schuurman A H, Kon M

机构信息

Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Jun;33(3):363-8. doi: 10.1177/1753193408087104.

Abstract

In this study, the insertion time and histological effects of drilling and hammering K-wires into bone are described. The insertion time was measured while drilling or hammering K-wires into the femurs and tibias of ten rabbits. Four K-wires, inserted into one hind limb, were used for histological examination directly after insertion and four K-wires inserted into the contralateral hind limb were used for the same measurements 4 weeks later. The specimens were scored for presence, or absence, of osteocytes, fragmentation of the bone edges, haemorrhage, microfractures, cortical reaction and callus formation around the pin track. The insertion time needed for drilling in K-wires was significantly longer than that of hammering. Drilling also resulted in the disappearance of the osteocytes in almost all sections while hammering did not have this effect but did result in more microfractures. Hammering K-wires may be a superior technique because it prevents osteonecrosis and requires a shorter insertion time.

摘要

在本研究中,描述了将克氏针钻入和锤入骨骼的插入时间及组织学效应。在将克氏针钻入和锤入十只兔子的股骨和胫骨时测量插入时间。插入一侧后肢的四根克氏针在插入后直接用于组织学检查,插入对侧后肢的四根克氏针在4周后用于相同测量。对标本的骨细胞存在与否、骨边缘碎裂、出血、微骨折、皮质反应以及针道周围的骨痂形成进行评分。钻入克氏针所需的插入时间明显长于锤入的时间。钻孔还导致几乎所有切片中的骨细胞消失,而锤入则没有这种效果,但确实导致更多微骨折。锤入克氏针可能是一种更优的技术,因为它可防止骨坏死且所需插入时间更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验