Shentu Weihui, Deng Youbin, Huang Runqing, Li Peng, Wei Xiang, Yang Haoyi, Zhang Yun, Xiong Li, Yu Fen, Wu Yuhan
Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2008 Jun;28(3):291-4. doi: 10.1007/s11596-008-0314-3. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
The myocardial viability after myocardial infarction was evaluated by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography. Intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed on 18 patients with myocardial infarction before coronary revascularization. Follow-up echocardiography was performed 3 months after coronary revascularization. Segmental wall motion was assessed using 18-segment LV model and classified as normal, hypokinesis, akinesis and dyskinesis. Viable myocardium was defined by evident improvement of segmental wall motion 3 months after coronary revascularization. Myocardial perfusion was assessed by visual interpretation and divided into 3 conditions: homogeneous opacification; partial or reduced opacification or subendocardial contrast defect; contrast defect. The former two conditions were used as the standard to define the viable myocardium. The results showed that 109 abnormal wall motion segments were detected among 18 patients with myocardial infarction, including 47 segments of hypokinesis, 56 segments of akinesis and 6 segments of dyskinesis. The wall motion of 2 segments with hypokinesis before coronary revascularization which showed homogeneous opacification, 14 of 24 segments with hypokinese and 20 of 24 segments with akinese before coronary revascularization which showed partial or reduced opacification or subendocardial contrast defect was improved 3 months after coronary revascularization. In our study, the sensitivity and specificity of evaluation of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction by intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography were 94.7% and 78.9%, respectively. It was concluded that intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography could accurately evaluate myocardial viability after myocardial infarction.
通过静脉心肌对比超声心动图评估心肌梗死后的心肌存活情况。对18例心肌梗死患者在冠状动脉血运重建术前进行静脉实时心肌对比超声心动图检查。在冠状动脉血运重建术后3个月进行随访超声心动图检查。使用18节段左心室模型评估节段性室壁运动,并分为正常、运动减弱、运动消失和运动障碍。存活心肌定义为冠状动脉血运重建术后3个月节段性室壁运动明显改善。通过视觉判读评估心肌灌注,并分为3种情况:均匀显影;部分或减弱显影或心内膜下对比剂缺损;对比剂缺损。前两种情况用作定义存活心肌的标准。结果显示,18例心肌梗死患者共检测到109个异常室壁运动节段,包括47个运动减弱节段、56个运动消失节段和6个运动障碍节段。冠状动脉血运重建术前2个运动减弱节段中显示均匀显影的节段,以及冠状动脉血运重建术前24个运动减弱节段中的14个和24个运动消失节段中的20个显示部分或减弱显影或心内膜下对比剂缺损的节段,在冠状动脉血运重建术后3个月运动得到改善。在本研究中,静脉实时心肌对比超声心动图评估心肌梗死后心肌存活情况的敏感性和特异性分别为94.7%和78.9%。结论是,静脉实时心肌对比超声心动图可准确评估心肌梗死后的心肌存活情况。