Suppr超能文献

活化蛋白C治疗急性肺损伤的随机临床试验。

Randomized clinical trial of activated protein C for the treatment of acute lung injury.

作者信息

Liu Kathleen D, Levitt Joseph, Zhuo Hanjing, Kallet Richard H, Brady Sandra, Steingrub Jay, Tidswell Mark, Siegel Mark D, Soto Graciela, Peterson Michael W, Chesnutt Mark S, Phillips Charles, Weinacker Ann, Thompson B Taylor, Eisner Mark D, Matthay Michael A

机构信息

Division of Nephrology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Box 0532, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0532, USA.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep 15;178(6):618-23. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200803-419OC. Epub 2008 Jun 19.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Microvascular injury, inflammation, and coagulation play critical roles in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury (ALI). Plasma protein C levels are decreased in patients with acute lung injury and are associated with higher mortality and fewer ventilator-free days.

OBJECTIVES

To test the efficacy of activated protein C (APC) as a therapy for patients with ALI.

METHODS

Eligible subjects were critically ill patients who met the American/European consensus criteria for ALI. Patients with severe sepsis and an APACHE II score of 25 or more were excluded. Participants were randomized to receive APC (24 microg/kg/h for 96 h) or placebo in a double-blind fashion within 72 hours of the onset of ALI. The primary endpoint was ventilator-free days.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

APC increased plasma protein C levels (P = 0.002) and decreased pulmonary dead space fraction (P = 0.02). However, there was no statistically significant difference between patients receiving placebo (n = 38) or APC (n = 37) in the number of ventilator-free days (median [25-75% interquartile range]: 19 [0-24] vs. 19 [14-22], respectively; P = 0.78) or in 60-day mortality (5/38 vs. 5/37 patients, respectively; P = 1.0). There were no differences in the number of bleeding events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

APC did not improve outcomes from ALI. The results of this trial do not support a large clinical trial of APC for ALI in the absence of severe sepsis and high disease severity.

摘要

理论依据

微血管损伤、炎症和凝血在急性肺损伤(ALI)的发病机制中起关键作用。急性肺损伤患者的血浆蛋白C水平降低,且与较高的死亡率和较少的无呼吸机天数相关。

目的

测试活化蛋白C(APC)治疗急性肺损伤患者的疗效。

方法

符合条件的受试者为符合美国/欧洲ALI共识标准的重症患者。排除患有严重脓毒症且急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II评分为25分或更高的患者。参与者在急性肺损伤发作后72小时内以双盲方式随机接受APC(24微克/千克/小时,持续96小时)或安慰剂治疗。主要终点是无呼吸机天数。

测量指标与主要结果

APC可提高血浆蛋白C水平(P = 0.002)并降低肺死腔分数(P = 0.02)。然而,接受安慰剂(n = 38)或APC(n = 37)治疗的患者在无呼吸机天数(中位数[25 - 75%四分位数间距]:分别为19[0 - 24]天和19[14 - 22]天;P = 0.78)或60天死亡率(分别为5/38和5/37例患者;P = 1.0)方面无统计学显著差异。两组之间的出血事件数量无差异。

结论

APC并未改善急性肺损伤的预后。在不存在严重脓毒症和高疾病严重程度的情况下,该试验结果不支持对急性肺损伤进行APC的大型临床试验。

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of activated protein C for the treatment of acute lung injury.活化蛋白C治疗急性肺损伤的随机临床试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep 15;178(6):618-23. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200803-419OC. Epub 2008 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Cellular Mechanisms of Lung Injury: Current Perspectives.细胞机制与肺损伤:当前观点。
Clin Chest Med. 2024 Dec;45(4):821-833. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
4
7
Authors' Reply.作者回复。
Am J Pathol. 2022 Sep;192(9):1337-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.06.014.

本文引用的文献

7
Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury.急性肺损伤中两种液体管理策略的比较
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 15;354(24):2564-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062200. Epub 2006 May 21.
10
Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury.急性肺损伤的发病率及转归
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1685-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050333.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验