White Katherine K, Abrams Lise, Zoller Sarah M, Gibson Samantha M
Department of Psychology, College of Charleston, 57 Coming Street, Charleston, SC 29424, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jul;61(7):977-85. doi: 10.1080/17470210801943978.
Despite considerable research on language production errors involving speech, little research exists in the complementary domain of writing. Two experiments investigated the production of homophone substitution errors, which occur when a contextually appropriate word (e.g., beech) is replaced with its homophone (e.g., beach tree). Participants wrote down auditorily presented sentences containing dominant or subordinate homophones. Homophones were preceded by a lexical prime that overlapped in phonology and orthography (e.g., teacher) or only orthography (e.g., headmaster) with the target homophone. Results showed more substitution errors when the context elicited a subordinate homophone than when it elicited a dominant homophone. Furthermore, both types of primes equivalently increased production of homophone errors relative to control words (e.g., lawyer), suggesting that only orthographic overlap between the prime and target was necessary to influence errors. These results are explained within dual-route models of spelling, which postulate an interaction between lexical and sublexical routes when spelling.
尽管对涉及言语的语言产生错误进行了大量研究,但在写作这一互补领域的研究却很少。两项实验研究了同音异形词替换错误的产生,当一个上下文合适的单词(如beech)被其同音异形词(如beach tree)替换时就会出现这种错误。参与者写下听觉呈现的包含显性或隐性同音异形词的句子。同音异形词之前有一个在语音和拼写上与目标同音异形词重叠(如teacher)或仅在拼写上重叠(如headmaster)的词汇启动词。结果表明,当上下文引出隐性同音异形词时,替换错误比引出显性同音异形词时更多。此外,相对于控制词(如lawyer),两种类型的启动词都同样增加了同音异形词错误的产生,这表明启动词和目标之间仅需拼写上的重叠就能影响错误。这些结果在拼写的双路径模型中得到了解释,该模型假设在拼写时词汇路径和次词汇路径之间存在相互作用。