Peters Stephen C
Lehigh University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
J Contam Hydrol. 2008 Jul 29;99(1-4):8-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
Naturally occurring arsenic in the bedrock of the Northern Appalachian Mountain belt was first recognized in the late 19th century. The knowledge of the behavior of arsenic in groundwater in this region has lagged behind nearly a century, with the popular press reporting on local studies in the early 1980s, and most peer-reviewed research articles on regional patterns conducted and written in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Research reports have shown that within this high arsenic region, between 6% and 22% of households using private drinking water wells contain arsenic in excess of 10 microg/L, the United States Environmental Protection Agency's maximum contaminant level. In nearly all reports, arsenic in drinking water was derived from naturally occurring geologic sources, typically arsenopyrite, substituted sulfides such as arsenian pyrite, and nanoscale minerals such as westerveldite. In most studies, arsenic concentrations in groundwater were controlled by pH dependent adsorption to mineral surfaces, most commonly iron oxide minerals. In some cases, reductive dissolution of iron minerals has been shown to increase arsenic concentrations in groundwater, more commonly associated with anthropogenic activities such as landfills. Evidence of nitrate reduction promoting the presence of arsenic(V) and iron(III) minerals in anoxic environments has been shown to occur in surface waters, and in this manuscript we show this process perhaps applies to groundwater. The geologic explanation for the high arsenic region in the Northern Appalachian Mountain belt is most likely the crustal recycling of arsenic as an incompatible element during tectonic activity. Accretion of multiple terranes, in particular Avalonia and the Central Maine Terrane of New England appear to be connected to the presence of high concentrations of arsenic. Continued tectonic activity and recycling of these older terranes may also be responsible for the high arsenic observed in the Triassic rift basins, e.g. the Newark Basin. There are only two well-known cases of anthropogenic contamination of the environment in the northern Appalachian Mountain belt, both of which are industrial sites with surface contamination at that infiltrated the local groundwater.
北阿巴拉契亚山脉带基岩中天然存在的砷在19世纪末首次被发现。该地区地下水中砷行为的相关知识落后了近一个世纪,大众媒体在20世纪80年代初报道了当地的研究,而大多数关于区域模式的同行评审研究文章是在20世纪90年代末和21世纪初进行并撰写的。研究报告表明,在这个高砷地区,6%至22%使用私人饮用水井的家庭所用水中砷含量超过10微克/升,即美国环境保护局规定的最大污染物水平。几乎在所有报告中,饮用水中的砷都来自天然地质源,通常是毒砂、替代硫化物如含砷黄铁矿以及纳米级矿物如韦斯特维尔德石。在大多数研究中,地下水中的砷浓度受与矿物表面的pH相关吸附控制,最常见的是氧化铁矿物。在某些情况下,铁矿物的还原溶解已被证明会增加地下水中的砷浓度,这更常与垃圾填埋场等人为活动相关。有证据表明,在缺氧环境中,硝酸盐还原促进了砷(V)和铁(III)矿物的存在,这一现象已在地表水中出现,在本论文中我们表明这个过程可能也适用于地下水。北阿巴拉契亚山脉带高砷地区的地质解释很可能是在构造活动期间,砷作为不相容元素进行了地壳循环。多个地体的增生,特别是阿瓦隆尼亚和新英格兰的缅因中央地体,似乎与高浓度砷的存在有关。这些古老地体持续的构造活动和循环也可能是三叠纪裂谷盆地(如纽瓦克盆地)中观察到高砷现象的原因。在北阿巴拉契亚山脉带,只有两起已知的人为环境污染案例,两者都是工业场地,其地表污染渗入了当地地下水。