Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房治疗干预后严重中风患者生存及功能能力的预测

Prediction of the survival and functional ability of severe stroke patients after ICU therapeutic intervention.

作者信息

Riachy Moussa, Sfeir Frida, Sleilaty Ghassan, Hage-Chahine Samer, Dabar Georges, Bazerbachi Taha, Aoun-Bacha Zeina, Khayat Georges, Koussa Salam

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hotel Dieu de France, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2008 Jun 26;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-8-24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the benefits and impact of ICU therapeutic interventions on the survival and functional ability of severe cerebrovascular accident (CVA) patients.

METHODS

Sixty-two ICU patients suffering from severe ischemic/haemorrhagic stroke were evaluated for CVA severity using APACHE II and the Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival tables and survival prediction factors were determined by Cox multivariate analysis. Functional ability was assessed using the stroke impact scale (SIS-16) and Karnofsky score. Risk factors, life support techniques and neurosurgical interventions were recorded. One year post-CVA dependency was investigated using multivariate analysis based on linear regression.

RESULTS

The study cohort constituted 6% of all CVA (37.8% haemorrhagic/62.2% ischemic) admissions. Patient mean(SD) age was 65.8(12.3) years with a 1:1 male: female ratio. During the study period 16 patients had died within the ICU and seven in the year following hospital release. The mean(SD) APACHE II score at hospital admission was 14.9(6.0) and ICU mean duration of stay was 11.2(15.4) days. Mechanical ventilation was required in 37.1% of cases. Risk ratios were; GCS at admission 0.8(0.14), (p = 0.024), APACHE II 1.11(0.11), (p = 0.05) and duration of mechanical ventilation 1.07(0.07), (p = 0.046). Linear coefficients were: type of CVA - haemorrhagic versus ischemic: -18.95(4.58) (p = 0.007), GCS at hospital admission: -6.83(1.08), (p = 0.001), and duration of hospital stay -0.38(0.14), (p = 0.40).

CONCLUSION

To ensure a better prognosis CVA patients require ICU therapeutic interventions. However, as we have shown, where tests can determine the worst affected patients with a poor vital and functional outcome should treatment be withheld?

摘要

背景

本研究评估了重症监护病房(ICU)治疗干预措施对重症脑血管意外(CVA)患者生存及功能能力的益处和影响。

方法

使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)对62例患有严重缺血性/出血性卒中的ICU患者的CVA严重程度进行评估。使用Kaplan-Meier生存表确定生存率,并通过Cox多变量分析确定生存预测因素。使用卒中影响量表(SIS-16)和卡诺夫斯基评分评估功能能力。记录危险因素、生命支持技术和神经外科干预措施。基于线性回归的多变量分析对CVA后一年的依赖性进行了研究。

结果

该研究队列占所有CVA入院患者的6%(37.8%为出血性/62.2%为缺血性)。患者平均(标准差)年龄为65.8(12.3)岁,男女比例为1:1。在研究期间,16例患者在ICU内死亡,7例在出院后一年内死亡。入院时APACHE II评分的平均(标准差)为14.9(6.0),ICU平均住院时间为11.2(15.4)天。37.1%的病例需要机械通气。风险比为:入院时GCS为0.8(0.14),(p = 0.024),APACHE II为1.11(0.11),(p = 0.05),机械通气持续时间为1.07(0.07),(p = 0.046)。线性系数为:CVA类型 - 出血性与缺血性:-18.95(4.58)(p = 0.007),入院时GCS:-6.83(1.08),(p = 0.001),住院时间:-0.38(0.14),(p = 0.40)。

结论

为确保更好的预后,CVA患者需要ICU治疗干预措施。然而,正如我们所表明的,在通过检查能够确定病情最严重、生命和功能预后较差的患者时,是否应该停止治疗呢?

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e534/2443378/ed500ab89c2f/1471-2377-8-24-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验