Shikora Scott A, Kim Julie J, Tarnoff Michael E
Division of Bariatric Surgery, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Nov-Dec;4(6):729-34. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
Several publications have suggested that staple line buttressing might decrease staple line bleeding, increase burst pressure, and decrease the likelihood of acute failure resulting in leak. Currently, permanent and nonpermanent options are available. However, concern has been raised about the permanent buttress material and its potential for delayed strip expulsion. This study analyzed our experience with 3 different buttressing materials for creating the gastric division during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
From July 5, 2001 to May 30, 2007, 1451 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass with buttressing material used for the stapled creation of the gastric pouch. Peristrips Dry (PSDs), permanent bovine pericardial strips, were used in 926 cases from July 5, 2001 to October 11, 2005. Seamguards, a synthetic bioabsorbable product, were used in 145 cases from November 2, 2004 to July 18, 2006, and PSD Veritas, remodelable, nonpermanent bovine pericardial strips, were placed in 380 patients from October 11, 2005 to May 30, 2007. All products were applied to the 60-mm-long, 3.5-mm cartridges of the EndoGIA II stapler. The ease of use, operative complications, visual bleeding, and postoperative leaks were recorded.
The patient characteristics were comparable for all groups. All products were easy to load on the stapler, and no operative complications related to the use of the buttress materials occurred. The incidence and severity of staple line bleeding was not specifically calculated but was visually noted to be minimal in all cases. Of the 3 groups, 4 contained leaks occurred in the Seamguards group, and all were successfully managed nonoperatively. No acute leaks were discovered in the PSD or PSD Veritas groups. This difference was statistically significant (p <.001).
Neither the PSDs or PSD Veritas group exhibited staple line complications. However, 4 leaks occurred in the patients who had Seamguards incorporated into their gastric pouch linear staple lines.
一些出版物表明,吻合钉线加固可能会减少吻合钉线出血、增加爆破压力并降低导致渗漏的急性失败的可能性。目前,有永久性和非永久性两种选择。然而,人们对永久性支撑材料及其延迟条带排出的可能性表示担忧。本研究分析了我们在腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术中使用3种不同支撑材料创建胃分隔的经验。
从2001年7月5日至2007年5月30日,1451例连续患者接受了腹腔镜胃旁路手术,并使用支撑材料进行吻合钉创建胃囊。2001年7月5日至2005年10月11日,926例患者使用了Peristrips Dry(PSD),即永久性牛心包条带。2004年11月2日至2006年7月18日,145例患者使用了Seamguards,一种合成生物可吸收产品,2005年10月11日至2007年5月30日,380例患者放置了PSD Veritas,即可重塑的非永久性牛心包条带。所有产品均应用于EndoGIA II吻合器的60毫米长、3.5毫米钉仓。记录使用的难易程度、手术并发症、肉眼可见的出血情况和术后渗漏情况。
所有组的患者特征具有可比性。所有产品都易于装载到吻合器上,且未发生与使用支撑材料相关的手术并发症。吻合钉线出血的发生率和严重程度未进行具体计算,但在所有病例中肉眼观察到出血极少。在这3组中,Seamguards组有4例发生渗漏,所有渗漏均通过非手术成功处理。PSD组或PSD Veritas组未发现急性渗漏。这种差异具有统计学意义(p<.001)。
PSD组和PSD Veritas组均未出现吻合钉线并发症。然而,在胃囊线性吻合钉线中使用了Seamguards的患者中有4例发生了渗漏。