Chiam Paul T L, del Valle-Fernández Raquel, Ruiz Carlos E
Department of Cardiac and Vascular Interventional Services, Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York, New York, USA.
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Jun;61 Suppl 2:10-24.
Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) are currently the commonest valvular pathologies in developed society. The current standard of treatment of severe AS and severe MR has been surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and mitral valve (MV) surgery. In 2002, the first human percutaneous AVR (PAVR) was performed and in 2005, results of percutaneous MV repair were also reported. The field of percutaneous transcatheter valve therapy is evolving very rapidly. There are 2 aortic percutaneous heart valves in clinical trials and several others with first-in-man data or in pre-clinical testing. Results seem promising and it appears that PAVR will most likely be a viable option for selected patients in a relatively short time. The future of AS treatment will evolve with the advent of devices which will be repositionable and retrievable, as well as integrating other materials engineered by nanotechnology and tissue engineering. There are several technologies being investigated in the field of MV repair, each attempting to mimic surgical technique. Compared with PAVR, percutaneous MV repair is a more complex process as many different pathological processes can result in MR. The current technologies will be suitable only for carefully selected patients with a specific etiology of MR. Most likely a combination of these technologies will be required for satisfactory MV repair although MV replacement may be what many of those patients require, and therefore percutaneous MV replacement will be an exciting alternative in the near future.
主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)和二尖瓣反流(MR)是当今发达社会最常见的瓣膜病变。目前,重度AS和重度MR的标准治疗方法是外科主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)和二尖瓣(MV)手术。2002年,首例经皮主动脉瓣置换术(PAVR)实施,2005年,经皮二尖瓣修复术的结果也被报道。经皮经导管瓣膜治疗领域发展非常迅速。有2种主动脉经皮心脏瓣膜正在进行临床试验,还有其他几种有首次人体数据或处于临床前测试阶段。结果似乎很有前景,而且在相对较短的时间内,PAVR很可能会成为部分患者的可行选择。随着可重新定位和可回收装置的出现,以及纳米技术和组织工程所设计的其他材料的整合,AS治疗的未来将会不断发展。MV修复领域正在研究多种技术,每种技术都试图模仿外科手术技术。与PAVR相比,经皮MV修复是一个更复杂的过程,因为许多不同的病理过程都可能导致MR。目前的技术仅适用于经过仔细挑选的、患有特定病因MR的患者。虽然许多这类患者可能需要MV置换,但令人满意的MV修复很可能需要这些技术的联合应用,因此经皮MV置换在不久的将来将是一个令人兴奋的选择。