Qi Tao, Christopoulos George, Bailey Richard J, Christopoulos Arthur, Sexton Patrick M, Hay Debbie L
School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Symonds Street, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;74(4):1059-71. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.047142. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
Calcitonin-family receptors comprise calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) or calcitonin receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) pairings. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors are CL/RAMP1, whereas adrenomedullin (AM) receptors are CL/RAMP2 (AM1 receptor) or CL/RAMP3 (AM2 receptor). Amylin (Amy) receptors are RAMP hetero-oligomers with the calcitonin receptor (AMY1, AMY2, and AMY3, respectively). How RAMPs change G protein-coupled receptor pharmacology is not fully understood. We exploited sequence differences between RAMP1 and RAMP3 to identify individual residues capable of altering receptor pharmacology. Alignment of human RAMPs revealed eight residues that are conserved in RAMP2 and RAMP3 but are different in RAMP1. We hypothesized that residues in RAMP2 and RAMP3, but not RAMP1, are responsible for making CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 AM receptors. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we introduced individual RAMP3 residues into RAMP1 and vice versa in these eight positions. Mutant or wild-type RAMPs were transfected into Cos7 cells with CL or the insert-negative form of the calcitonin receptor [CT(a)]. Agonist-stimulated cAMP production and cell-surface expression of constructs were measured. Position 74 in RAMP1 and RAMP3 was critical for determining AM potency and affinity, and Phe93 in RAMP1 was an important contributor to alphaCGRP potency at CGRP receptors. Mutant RAMP/CT(a) receptor complexes displayed different phenotypes. It is noteworthy that RAMP1 S103N and W74E mutations led to enhanced rAmy potency, probably related to increased cell-surface expression of these complexes. This differs from the effect on CL-based receptors where expression was unchanged. Targeted substitution has emphasized the importance of position 74 in RAMP1/RAMP3 as a key determinant of AM pharmacology.
降钙素家族受体由降钙素受体样受体(CL)或降钙素受体与受体活性修饰蛋白(RAMP)配对组成。降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)受体是CL/RAMP1,而肾上腺髓质素(AM)受体是CL/RAMP2(AM1受体)或CL/RAMP3(AM2受体)。胰淀素(Amy)受体是与降钙素受体形成的RAMP异源寡聚体(分别为AMY1、AMY2和AMY3)。RAMP如何改变G蛋白偶联受体药理学尚未完全明确。我们利用RAMP1和RAMP3之间的序列差异来确定能够改变受体药理学的单个残基。人类RAMP的比对显示,有八个残基在RAMP2和RAMP3中保守,但在RAMP1中不同。我们推测,RAMP2和RAMP3而非RAMP1中的残基负责形成CL/RAMP2和CL/RAMP3 AM受体。通过定点诱变,我们在这八个位置将单个RAMP3残基引入RAMP1,反之亦然。将突变型或野生型RAMP与CL或降钙素受体的插入缺失形式[CT(a)]一起转染到Cos7细胞中。测量激动剂刺激的构建体的cAMP产生和细胞表面表达。RAMP1和RAMP3中的第74位对于确定AM效力和亲和力至关重要,RAMP1中的Phe93是αCGRP在CGRP受体处效力的重要贡献者。突变型RAMP/CT(a)受体复合物表现出不同的表型。值得注意的是,RAMP1 S103N和W74E突变导致rAmy效力增强,这可能与这些复合物细胞表面表达增加有关。这与对基于CL的受体的影响不同,后者的表达没有变化。靶向取代强调了RAMP1/RAMP3中第74位作为AM药理学关键决定因素的重要性。