Suppr超能文献

经典克雷莫纳小提琴与现代小提琴木材密度的比较。

A comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins.

作者信息

Stoel Berend C, Borman Terry M

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Division of Image Processing, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2008 Jul 2;3(7):e2554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002554.

Abstract

Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been able to replicate the sound quality of these classical instruments. The vibration and sound radiation characteristics of a violin are determined by an instrument's geometry and the material properties of the wood. New test methods allow the non-destructive examination of one of the key material properties, the wood density, at the growth ring level of detail. The densities of five classical and eight modern violins were compared, using computed tomography and specially developed image-processing software. No significant differences were found between the median densities of the modern and the antique violins, however the density difference between wood grains of early and late growth was significantly smaller in the classical Cremonese violins compared with modern violins, in both the top (Spruce) and back (Maple) plates (p = 0.028 and 0.008, respectively). The mean density differential (SE) of the top plates of the modern and classical violins was 274 (26.6) and 183 (11.7) gram/liter. For the back plates, the values were 128 (2.6) and 115 (2.0) gram/liter. These differences in density differentials may reflect similar changes in stiffness distributions, which could directly impact vibrational efficacy or indirectly modify sound radiation via altered damping characteristics. Either of these mechanisms may help explain the acoustical differences between the classical and modern violins.

摘要

由克雷莫纳大师制作的古典小提琴,如安东尼奥·斯特拉迪瓦里和朱塞佩·瓜尔内里·德尔·杰苏制作的小提琴,已成为所有小提琴在表现力和声音投射能力方面进行声音比较的基准。人们普遍认为,自那时以来,没有哪位制琴师能够复制这些古典乐器的音质。小提琴的振动和声音辐射特性由乐器的几何形状和木材的材料特性决定。新的测试方法允许在生长年轮细节层面无损检测关键材料特性之一——木材密度。使用计算机断层扫描和专门开发的图像处理软件,比较了五把古典小提琴和八把现代小提琴的密度。现代小提琴和古董小提琴的中位密度之间没有发现显著差异,然而,与现代小提琴相比,古典克雷莫纳小提琴的顶部(云杉)和背板(枫木)的早晚期生长木材纹理之间的密度差异明显更小(分别为p = 0.028和0.008)。现代小提琴和古典小提琴顶部面板的平均密度差(标准误差)分别为274(26.6)和183(11.7)克/升。背板的数值分别为128(2.6)和115(2.0)克/升。密度差的这些差异可能反映了刚度分布的类似变化,这可能直接影响振动效率,或通过改变阻尼特性间接改变声音辐射。这两种机制中的任何一种都可能有助于解释古典小提琴和现代小提琴之间的声学差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4989/2438473/6ca311a37383/pone.0002554.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验