Griesdale Donald E G, Bosma T Laine, Kurth Tobias, Isac George, Chittock Dean R
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Oct;34(10):1835-42. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1205-6. Epub 2008 Jul 5.
Assess the risk of complications during endotracheal intubation (ETI) and their association with the skill level of the intubating physician.
Prospective cohort study of 136 patients intubated by the intensive care team during a 5-month period. Standardized data forms were used to collect detailed information on the intubating physicians, supervisors, techniques, medications and complications.
Canadian academic intensive care unit.
All intubations were successful and there were no deaths during intubation. Non-experts were supervised in 92% of procedures. Expert operators were successful within two attempts in 94%, compared to only 82% of non-experts (P = 0.03), with 13.2% of all intubations requiring > or =3 attempts. Furthermore, 10.3% of intubations required 10 or more minutes. Difficult intubation (3 or more attempts by an expert) occurred in 6.6%. Overall risk of complications was 39%, including: severe hypoxemia (19.1%), severe hypotension (9.6%), esophageal intubation (7.4%) and frank aspiration (5.9%). ICU and hospital mortality were 15.4 and 29.4%, respectively. Compared with non-expert intubating physicians, propensity score-adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for expert physicians were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.28, 3.05, P = 0.89) for any complication, 0.45 (95% CI: 0.09, 2.20, P = 0.32) for ICU mortality and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.13, 1.70, P = 0.25) for hospital mortality. Two or more attempts at ETI was independently associated with an increased risk of severe complications (OR 3.31, 95% CI: 1.30, 8.40, P = 0.01).
These prospective data show a high risk of serious complications, and difficult intubations, that are associated with ETI of the critically ill.
Artificial airways and complications.
评估气管插管期间并发症的风险及其与插管医生技术水平的关联。
对重症监护团队在5个月期间为136例患者进行气管插管的前瞻性队列研究。使用标准化数据表格收集有关插管医生、监督人员、技术、药物和并发症的详细信息。
加拿大的学术重症监护病房。
所有插管均成功,插管期间无死亡病例。92%的操作有非专家进行监督。专家操作者94%在两次尝试内成功,而非专家仅为82%(P = 0.03),所有插管中有13.2%需要≥3次尝试。此外,10.3%的插管需要10分钟或更长时间。困难插管(专家进行3次或更多次尝试)发生率为6.6%。总体并发症风险为39%——包括:严重低氧血症(19.1%)、严重低血压(9.6%)、食管插管(7.4%)和明显误吸(5.9%)。重症监护病房和医院死亡率分别为15.4%和29.4%。与非专家插管医生相比,专家医生发生任何并发症的倾向评分调整优势比(95%置信区间)为0.92(95%CI:0.28,3.05,P = 0.89),重症监护病房死亡率为0.45(95%CI:0.09,2.20,P = 0.32),医院死亡率为0.47(95%CI:0.13,1.70,P = 0.25)。气管插管两次或更多次独立增加严重并发症风险(OR 3.31,95%CI:1.30,8.40,P = 0.01)。
这些前瞻性数据显示,重症患者气管插管存在严重并发症和困难插管的高风险。
人工气道与并发症