Bergón Enrique, Miravalles Elena
Department of Clinical Pathology, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(8):1156-62. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.232.
Serum monoclonal proteins (M-proteins) are usually quantified by electrophoresis or immunochemical measurement. A third alternative involves immunochemical measurement of the monoclonal isotype by subtraction of the polyclonal part of the isotype calculated from the other polyclonal isotypes and light chain. We experimentally calculated heavy chain/light chain equivalence factors for three immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes and compared serum M-protein concentrations obtained using the three approaches.
Equivalence factors were calculated for 1427 samples from 322 patients with a clinical diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and validated in serum samples with and without a monoclonal component. Serum light chain recovery by nephelometry was compared to estimates using factors for serum immunoglobulin concentrations. Some 3735 samples were measured by electrophoresis and nephelometry for comparison of M-protein concentrations.
The experimentally calculated factors were 3.3059 (IgGkappa), 3.5204 (IgGlambda), 3.4567 (IgAkappa), 3.5308 (IgAlambda), 4.9104 (IgMkappa) and 4.8020 (IgMlambda). Light chains quantified by nephelometry in 984 serum samples without M-protein gave recovery of 100.97%+/-6.89% compared to immunoglobulin concentration estimates. Light chain recovery of <80% was observed more often for IgMkappa (61.0%) and IgMlambda (42.5%). Method differences for M-protein were >25% for 37.4%-52.3% of the serum samples. Electrophoresis results were higher than nephelometry results for 5% of serum samples and 23.7% of the estimates, especially for M-protein <20 g/L. Method differences for concentrations >40 g/L were <25% for most IgG and IgA isotypes, but not IgM.
No method can accurately measure serum M-proteins over the entire concentration range. Estimation using polyclonal immunoglobulins and light chains represents a simple alternative to electrophoresis that is applicable to any serum M-protein concentration, regardless of electrophoretic migration and particularly for M-protein serum <20 g/L.
血清单克隆蛋白(M蛋白)通常通过电泳或免疫化学测量进行定量。第三种方法是通过从其他多克隆同种型和轻链计算出的同种型多克隆部分相减来对单克隆同种型进行免疫化学测量。我们通过实验计算了三种免疫球蛋白(Ig)同种型的重链/轻链等效因子,并比较了使用这三种方法获得的血清M蛋白浓度。
计算了322例临床诊断为意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者的1427份样本的等效因子,并在有和无单克隆成分的血清样本中进行了验证。通过散射比浊法测定的血清轻链回收率与使用血清免疫球蛋白浓度因子的估计值进行了比较。约3735份样本通过电泳和散射比浊法进行测量,以比较M蛋白浓度。
实验计算的因子分别为3.3059(IgGκ)、3.5204(IgGλ)、3.4567(IgAκ)、3.5308(IgAλ)、4.9104(IgMκ)和4.8020(IgMλ)。在984份无M蛋白的血清样本中,通过散射比浊法测定的轻链回收率为100.97%±6.89%,与免疫球蛋白浓度估计值相比。IgMκ(61.0%)和IgMλ(42.5%)的轻链回收率<80%更为常见。37.4% - 52.3%的血清样本中M蛋白的方法差异>25%。5%的血清样本和23.7%的估计值中,电泳结果高于散射比浊法结果,特别是对于M蛋白<20 g/L的情况。对于浓度>40 g/L的情况,大多数IgG和IgA同种型的方法差异<25%,但IgM除外。
没有一种方法能够在整个浓度范围内准确测量血清M蛋白。使用多克隆免疫球蛋白和轻链进行估计是一种简单的电泳替代方法,适用于任何血清M蛋白浓度,无论电泳迁移情况如何,特别是对于血清M蛋白<20 g/L的情况。