双相情感障碍中脑源性神经营养因子Val66Met等位基因特异性mRNA水平的分析。

Analysis of BDNF Val66Met allele-specific mRNA levels in bipolar disorder.

作者信息

De Luca Vincenzo, Strauss John, Semeralul Mawahib, Huang Sheeda, Li Peter P, Warsh Jerry J, Kennedy James L, Wong Albert H C

机构信息

Neurogenetics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2008 Aug 22;441(2):229-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.06.025. Epub 2008 Jun 13.

Abstract

We have previously reported an association between the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and bipolar disorder (BD). However, the possibility that genomic imprinting in BDNF gene affects risk for BD has not been investigated. To examine the possibility of genomic imprinting in the BDNF gene in BD, we analyzed the parent-of-origin effect (POE) and differential expression of the BDNF Val66Met alleles in BD. We performed a family-based association study and ETDT analyses of the Val66Met polymorphism in 312 BD nuclear families, and compared allele-specific mRNA levels in both post-mortem brain samples and B lymphoblasts from BD patients and controls. The BDNF Val66 allele was transmitted significantly more often to patients with BD (maternal transmissions: 46/22, p=0.003; paternal transmissions: 55/30, p=0.006). There was no significant difference between maternal and paternal transmission ratios. There was no significant difference in the ratio of Val/Met-specific mRNA expression between BD and controls, in either brain or B lymphoblasts. The Val/Met ratio was much lower in the brain vs. B lymphoblasts. These data do not support a role for genomic imprinting as a modifier of the contribution of BDNF gene to risk of susceptibility to BD.

摘要

我们之前报道过脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)Val66Met多态性与双相情感障碍(BD)之间存在关联。然而,BDNF基因中的基因组印记影响BD发病风险的可能性尚未得到研究。为了检验BD中BDNF基因的基因组印记可能性,我们分析了BD中BDNF Val66Met等位基因的亲本来源效应(POE)和差异表达。我们对312个BD核心家庭中的Val66Met多态性进行了基于家系的关联研究和ETDT分析,并比较了BD患者和对照的死后脑样本及B淋巴细胞中特定等位基因的mRNA水平。BDNF Val66等位基因传递给BD患者的频率显著更高(母系传递:46/22,p = 0.003;父系传递:55/30,p = 0.006)。母系和父系传递比例之间无显著差异。BD患者与对照在脑或B淋巴细胞中Val/Met特异性mRNA表达比例上无显著差异。脑内的Val/Met比例远低于B淋巴细胞。这些数据不支持基因组印记作为BDNF基因对BD易感性贡献的修饰因子发挥作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索