Suzuki Hiroyoshi, Okihara Koji, Miyake Hideaki, Fujisawa Masato, Miyoshi Susumu, Matsumoto Tetsuro, Fujii Motohiro, Takihana Yoshio, Usui Tsuguru, Matsuda Tadashi, Ozono Seiichiro, Kumon Hiromi, Ichikawa Tomohiko, Miki Tsuneharu
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):921-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.045. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
Large meta-analyses have documented that maximum androgen blockade with nonsteroidal antiandrogens for advanced prostate cancer confers survival benefits, although it remains controversial. Also, we and others have reported the effectiveness of second line hormonal therapy for prostate cancer that relapses after initial hormone therapy. However, there is little clinical evidence of the effectiveness of the latter treatment strategy. Therefore, in this multicenter trial in Japan we analyzed clinical outcomes following alternative changing from 1 nonsteroidal antiandrogen to another, ie bicalutamide to flutamide and flutamide to bicalutamide, for advanced prostate cancer that relapsed after initial maximum androgen blockade.
The study included 232 patients with advanced prostate cancer who were initially treated with maximum androgen blockade, including surgical or medical castration combined with nonsteroidal antiandrogens. If a patient relapsed while on first line therapy, we discontinued antiandrogen and evaluated the patient for antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome. We then administered an alternative antiandrogen and evaluated its effect.
The incidence of antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome after initial maximum androgen blockade was 15.5% for bicalutamide and 12.8% for flutamide. A prostate specific antigen decrease after antiandrogen withdrawal was a prognostic factor. Nonsteroidal antiandrogens as alternative therapy in patients with relapse after the initial maximum androgen blockade were effective (prostate specific antigen decrease greater than 50%) as second line maximum androgen blockade. Of 232 patients 142 (61.2%) showed a prostate specific antigen decrease in response to an alternative antiandrogen. These responders had significantly better survival than nonresponders, suggesting that responsiveness to second line therapy predicts increased survival.
Following maximum androgen blockade with an alternative nonsteroidal antiandrogen is effective for advanced prostate cancer that has relapsed after initial maximum androgen blockade. Even a partial response to second line maximum androgen blockade was associated with improved survival. Our data support the notion that responders to second line regimens are androgen independent but still hormonally sensitive.
大型荟萃分析表明,对于晚期前列腺癌,采用非甾体类抗雄激素药物进行最大雄激素阻断可带来生存益处,尽管这仍存在争议。此外,我们及其他研究人员已报道了二线激素疗法对初始激素治疗后复发的前列腺癌的有效性。然而,关于后一种治疗策略有效性的临床证据很少。因此,在日本的这项多中心试验中,我们分析了晚期前列腺癌在初始最大雄激素阻断后从一种非甾体类抗雄激素药物换用另一种药物(即比卡鲁胺换为氟他胺以及氟他胺换为比卡鲁胺)后的临床结局。
该研究纳入了232例晚期前列腺癌患者,这些患者最初接受了最大雄激素阻断治疗,包括手术去势或药物去势联合非甾体类抗雄激素药物。如果患者在一线治疗期间复发,我们停用抗雄激素药物并评估患者是否出现抗雄激素撤药综合征。然后给予替代抗雄激素药物并评估其效果。
初始最大雄激素阻断后,比卡鲁胺引起抗雄激素撤药综合征的发生率为15.5%,氟他胺为12.8%。抗雄激素撤药后前列腺特异性抗原降低是一个预后因素。在初始最大雄激素阻断后复发的患者中,非甾体类抗雄激素药物作为替代疗法作为二线最大雄激素阻断是有效的(前列腺特异性抗原降低大于50%)。在232例患者中,142例(61.2%)对替代抗雄激素药物有反应,前列腺特异性抗原降低。这些有反应者的生存期明显优于无反应者,这表明对二线治疗的反应性可预测生存期延长。
对于初始最大雄激素阻断后复发的晚期前列腺癌,采用替代非甾体类抗雄激素药物进行最大雄激素阻断是有效的。即使对二线最大雄激素阻断有部分反应也与生存期改善相关。我们的数据支持这样的观点,即对二线治疗方案有反应者是雄激素非依赖性的,但仍对激素敏感。