Ryherd Erica E, Wang Lily M
Architectural Engineering Program, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 101A Peter Kiewit Institute, 1110 S. 67th St., Omaha, Nebraska 68182-0681, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):218-26. doi: 10.1121/1.2932075.
This research investigated differences in task performance and perception under six non-time-varying ventilation-type background noise spectra with differing tonality. The results were related to five indoor noise criteria systems: noise criteria, balanced noise criteria, room criteria, room criteria mark II, and the A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level (L(Aeq)). These criteria systems are commonly used in the U.S. building industry, but concerns exist over whether they are appropriate for all noise situations. Thirty test subjects completed three types of performance tasks (typing, reasoning, and math) and answered questions about their perception of the indoor environment under each noise condition. Results showed that performance scores did not change significantly across the six noise conditions, but there were differences in subjective perception. For example, perception trends for tonality, annoyance, and distraction changed based on the frequency and prominence of discrete tones in noise. However, these perceptual changes were not fully reflected in the criteria level or spectral quality ratings. Additionally, task performance was related to subjective perception but not to criteria level predictions. As a result, the authors suggest that the current criteria should be modified to account for the frequency and prominence of tones in background noise.
本研究调查了在六种具有不同音调的非时变通风型背景噪声频谱下任务表现和感知的差异。研究结果与五种室内噪声标准体系相关:噪声标准、平衡噪声标准、房间标准、房间标准第二版以及A加权等效声压级(L(Aeq))。这些标准体系在美国建筑行业中常用,但对于它们是否适用于所有噪声情况存在担忧。30名测试对象完成了三种类型的表现任务(打字、推理和数学),并回答了关于他们在每种噪声条件下对室内环境感知的问题。结果表明,在六种噪声条件下表现分数没有显著变化,但主观感知存在差异。例如,音调、烦恼和分心的感知趋势会根据噪声中离散音调的频率和突出程度而变化。然而,这些感知变化并未在标准水平或频谱质量评级中得到充分体现。此外,任务表现与主观感知相关,但与标准水平预测无关。因此,作者建议应修改当前标准,以考虑背景噪声中音调的频率和突出程度。