Suppr超能文献

患者如何看待初级保健:精神科急诊后少数群体状况的差异

How patients view primary care: differences by minority status after psychiatric emergency.

作者信息

Roman Jasmin S, Griswold Kim S, Smith Susan J, Servoss Timothy J

机构信息

New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, Family Medicine Residency, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Cult Divers. 2008 Summer;15(2):56-60.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients' race or ethnic background may affect their ability to access health care due to their socioeconomic status, hereditary predispositions to illnesses, or discrimination either perceived or actual by those providing health care. For patients with mental health disorders, additional barriers are created due to poor experiences with the health care system.

METHODS

This was a mixed methods randomized control study examining the effectiveness of care managers linking patients to primary care after psychiatric crisis. The aim reported in this paper was to analyze differences by minority status in patients' quantitative and qualitative responses before and after facilitation to primary care (N=85). Patients responded to a "patient enablement" and primary care index assessing their feelings of empowerment after a primary care visit; and to qualitative questions about their experiences and perceptions of care.

FINDINGS

Following a primary care visit, responses by minority and non-minority individuals did not differ significantly on either the patient enablement or primary care index score. On qualitative inquiry, both non-minorities and minorities reported positive and negative views of their health, with corresponding positive and negative health experiences.

DISCUSSION

In sum, there were no differences in patient enablement between the minority and non-minority subgroups over the course of the study, nor were there any changes in patient's perception of their relationship with healthcare providers. However, this cohort found primary care services less satisfactory than a general population without mental illness. Patients with psychiatric disorders experience stigmatization in their attempts to access health care. This stigma may have a greater impact than race and ethnicity, thereby leading to a similarity in perception of health care between minorities and non-minorities with mental illness.

摘要

背景

患者的种族或族裔背景可能因其社会经济地位、疾病的遗传易感性,或医疗保健提供者所感受到的或实际存在的歧视,而影响其获得医疗保健的能力。对于患有精神疾病的患者而言,由于在医疗保健系统中经历不佳,还会产生额外的障碍。

方法

这是一项混合方法随机对照研究,旨在检验护理经理在精神科危机后将患者与初级保健相联系的有效性。本文报告的目的是分析少数族裔身份在促进患者接受初级保健前后的定量和定性反应方面的差异(N = 85)。患者对“患者赋能”和初级保健指数做出回应,该指数评估他们在初级保健就诊后的赋权感受;并回答关于他们的就医经历和对护理的看法的定性问题。

研究结果

在进行初级保健就诊后,少数族裔和非少数族裔个体在患者赋能或初级保健指数得分上没有显著差异。在定性调查中,非少数族裔和少数族裔都报告了对自身健康的积极和消极看法,以及相应的积极和消极健康经历。

讨论

总之,在研究过程中,少数族裔和非少数族裔亚组在患者赋能方面没有差异,患者对其与医疗保健提供者关系的看法也没有任何变化。然而,该队列发现初级保健服务不如没有精神疾病的普通人群满意。患有精神疾病的患者在试图获得医疗保健时会受到污名化。这种污名可能比种族和族裔产生更大的影响,从而导致患有精神疾病的少数族裔和非少数族裔在对医疗保健的看法上具有相似性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验