Jones Risé, Flaherty Emalee G, Binns Helen J, Price Lori Lyn, Slora Eric, Abney Dianna, Harris Donna L, Christoffel Katherine Kaufer, Sege Robert D
Evaluation Solutions, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Pediatrics. 2008 Aug;122(2):259-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2312.
Primary care clinicians participating in the Child Abuse Reporting Experience Study did not report all suspected physical child abuse to child protective services. This evaluation of study data seeks (1) to identify factors clinicians weighed when deciding whether to report injuries they suspected might have been caused by child abuse; (2) to describe clinicians' management strategies for children with injuries from suspected child abuse that were not reported; and (3) to describe how clinicians explained not reporting high-suspicion injuries.
From the 434 pediatric primary care clinicians who participated in the Child Abuse Reporting Experience Study and who indicated they had provided care for a child with an injury they perceived as suspicious, a subsample of 75 of 81 clinicians completed a telephone interview. Interviewees included 36 clinicians who suspected child abuse but did not report the injury to child protective services (12 with high suspicion and 24 with some suspicion) and 39 who reported the suspicious injury. Interviews were analyzed for major themes and subthemes, including decision-making regarding reporting of suspected physical child abuse to child protective services and alternative management strategies.
Four major themes emerged regarding the clinicians' reporting decisions, that is, familiarity with the family, reference to elements of the case history, use of available resources, and perception of expected outcomes of reporting to child protective services. When they did not report, clinicians planned alternative management strategies, including active or informal case follow-up management. When interviewed, some clinicians modified their original opinion that an injury was likely or very likely caused by abuse, to explain why they did not report to child protective services.
Decisions about reporting to child protective services are guided by injury circumstances and history, knowledge of and experiences with the family, consultation with others, and previous experiences with child protective services.
参与儿童虐待报告经验研究的基层医疗临床医生并未将所有疑似儿童身体虐待事件报告给儿童保护服务机构。对研究数据的这项评估旨在:(1)确定临床医生在决定是否报告他们怀疑可能由儿童虐待导致的伤害时所权衡的因素;(2)描述临床医生对未报告的疑似儿童虐待所致受伤儿童的管理策略;(3)描述临床医生如何解释未报告高度可疑伤害的原因。
在参与儿童虐待报告经验研究且表示曾为一名他们认为受伤情况可疑的儿童提供过护理的434名儿科基层医疗临床医生中,81名临床医生的一个75人子样本完成了电话访谈。受访者包括36名怀疑存在儿童虐待但未向儿童保护服务机构报告该伤害的临床医生(12名高度怀疑,24名有些怀疑)以及39名报告了可疑伤害的临床医生。对访谈进行分析以找出主要主题和子主题,包括向儿童保护服务机构报告疑似儿童身体虐待的决策以及替代管理策略。
关于临床医生的报告决策出现了四个主要主题,即对家庭的熟悉程度、对病史要素的参考、可用资源的利用以及对向儿童保护服务机构报告的预期结果的认知。当他们未报告时,临床医生制定了替代管理策略,包括积极或非正式的病例随访管理。在接受访谈时,一些临床医生改变了他们最初认为伤害很可能或极有可能由虐待导致的看法,以解释他们为何未向儿童保护服务机构报告。
向儿童保护服务机构报告的决策受伤害情况和病史、对家庭的了解和经验、与他人的咨询以及之前与儿童保护服务机构打交道的经历所指导。