Ateschrang Atesch, Ochs Björn Gunnar, Lüdemann Martin, Weise Kuno, Albrecht Dirk
Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Tübingen der Eberhard-Karls Universität Tübingen, Abteilung für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;129(1):97-104. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0699-2. Epub 2008 Aug 2.
Autogenous bone grafting has been used in reconstructing bone defects and in stimulating fracture healing, producing high healing rates in the treatment of infected tibial non-unions. A novel therapeutic alternative is now available known as "vitalised allograft", a cancellous bone graft procured from femoral heads from living human donors and "vitalised" through the injection of autologous bone marrow. The aim of this study is to summarise the initial results of the fibula and tibia fusion using vitalised cancellous allograft in the treatment of infected tibial non-unions.
We initiated a follow-up of 15 prospective non-randomized patients who received a vitalised allograft in the treatment of infected tibial non-unions in order to produce bony union. The patients included 13 men and 2 women with an average age of 48 years. All patients received a multi-stage surgical approach. After establishing an infection-free environment, allogenic cancellous bone grafting was performed, intended as the final surgical procedure in fibula and tibia fusion. Our follow-up included a clinical and radiographic investigation of the calf in four planes. We analysed union-rate and time required for bony consolidation, as well as recurrent infections, re-fractures, potential graft-resorption, and time needed for graft and bone remodelling.
With an average follow-up of 17.1 months, infection control was obtained in 14 of 15 patients, producing an infection arrest rate of 93.3%. Radiographs indicated consolidation in 11 out of 15 cases, with a union rate of 73.3%. Bone union was achieved on average in 17.1 weeks.
Fibula and tibia fusion with allogenic cancellous bone grafting, vitalised through autogenic bone marrow, could well become an innovative treatment option for infected tibial non-unions. We need, however, to analyse a higher number of cases over a longer follow-up period in order to assess more accurately recurrent infections and re-fractures.
自体骨移植已被用于修复骨缺损和促进骨折愈合,在治疗感染性胫骨骨不连方面具有较高的愈合率。现在有一种新的治疗选择,即“活性同种异体骨”,它是从活体人类供体的股骨头获取的松质骨移植材料,并通过注射自体骨髓使其“活化”。本研究的目的是总结使用活性松质骨同种异体骨进行腓骨和胫骨融合治疗感染性胫骨骨不连的初步结果。
我们对15例接受活性同种异体骨治疗感染性胫骨骨不连以实现骨愈合的前瞻性非随机患者进行了随访。患者包括13名男性和2名女性,平均年龄48岁。所有患者均接受多阶段手术方法。在建立无感染环境后,进行同种异体松质骨移植,作为腓骨和胫骨融合的最终手术步骤。我们的随访包括对小腿四个平面进行临床和影像学检查。我们分析了骨愈合率和骨巩固所需时间,以及复发性感染、再次骨折、潜在的移植骨吸收,以及移植骨和骨重塑所需时间。
平均随访17.1个月,15例患者中有14例实现了感染控制,感染停止率为93.3%。X线片显示15例中有11例骨愈合,愈合率为73.3%。平均在17.1周实现了骨愈合。
通过自体骨髓活化的同种异体松质骨移植进行腓骨和胫骨融合,很可能成为治疗感染性胫骨骨不连的一种创新治疗选择。然而,我们需要在更长的随访期内分析更多病例,以便更准确地评估复发性感染和再次骨折情况。