Vist Gunn Elisabeth, Bryant Dianne, Somerville Lyndsay, Birminghem Trevor, Oxman Andrew D
Department of Evidence-Based Health Services, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Health Services, PO Box 7004, St Olavs Plass, Oslo, Norway, 0130.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):MR000009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000009.pub4.
Some people believe that patients who take part in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) face risks that they would not face if they opted for non-trial treatment. Others think that trial participation is beneficial and the best way to ensure access to the most up-to-date physicians and treatments. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 1, 2005.
To assess the effects of patient participation in RCTs ('trial effects') independent both of the effects of the clinical treatments being compared ('treatment effects') and any differences between patients who participated in RCTs and those who did not. We aimed to compare similar patients receiving similar treatment inside and outside of RCTs.
In March 2007, we searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Methodology Register, SciSearch and PsycINFO for potentially relevant studies. Our search yielded 7586 new references. In addition, we reviewed the reference lists of relevant articles.
Randomized studies and cohort studies with data on clinical outcomes of RCT participants and similar patients who received similar treatment outside of RCTs.
At least two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, assessed study quality and extracted data.
We identified 30 new non-randomized cohort studies (45 comparisons): no new RCTs were found. This update now includes five RCTs (yielding 6 comparisons) and 80 non-randomized cohort studies (130 comparisons), with 86,640 patients treated in RCTs and 57,205 patients treated outside RCTs. In the randomised studies, patients were invited to participate in an RCT or not; these comparisons provided limited information because of small sample sizes (a total of 412 patients) and the nature of the questions they addressed. When the results of RCTs and non-randomized cohorts that reported dichotomous outcomes were combined, there were 98 comparisons; there was also heterogeneity (P < 0.00001, I(2) = 42.2%) between studies. No statistical significant differences were found for 85 of the 98 comparisons. Eight comparisons reported statistically significant better outcomes for patients treated within RCTs, and five comparisons reported statistically significant worse outcomes for patients treated within RCTs. There was significant heterogeneity (P < 0.00001, I(2) = 58.2%) among the 38 continuous outcome comparisons. No statistically significant differences were found for 30 of the 38 comparisons. Three comparisons reported statistically significant better outcomes for patients treated within RCTs, and five comparisons reported statistically significant worse outcomes for patients treated within RCTs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates that participation in RCTs is associated with similar outcomes to receiving the same treatment outside RCTs. These results challenge the assertion that the results of RCTs are not applicable to usual practice.
一些人认为,参与随机对照试验(RCT)的患者面临着选择非试验性治疗时不会面临的风险。另一些人则认为参与试验是有益的,并且是确保获得最新医生和治疗方法的最佳途径。这是2005年第1期发表的原始Cochrane综述的更新版本。
评估患者参与RCT的效果(“试验效果”),独立于所比较的临床治疗效果(“治疗效果”)以及参与RCT的患者与未参与RCT的患者之间的任何差异。我们旨在比较在RCT内外接受相似治疗的相似患者。
2007年3月,我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane方法学注册库、SciSearch和PsycINFO,以查找潜在的相关研究。我们的检索产生了7586条新参考文献。此外,我们还查阅了相关文章的参考文献列表。
具有RCT参与者以及在RCT之外接受相似治疗的相似患者临床结局数据的随机研究和队列研究。
至少两名综述作者独立评估研究是否纳入、评估研究质量并提取数据。
我们确定了30项新的非随机队列研究(45项比较):未发现新的RCT。此次更新现在包括5项RCT(产生6项比较)和80项非随机队列研究(130项比较),有86640名患者在RCT中接受治疗,57205名患者在RCT之外接受治疗。在随机研究中,患者被邀请参与或不参与RCT;由于样本量小(总共412名患者)以及所涉及问题的性质,这些比较提供的信息有限。当报告二分结局的RCT和非随机队列的结果合并时,有98项比较;研究之间也存在异质性(P<0.00001,I²=42.2%)。98项比较中有85项未发现统计学显著差异。8项比较报告RCT内治疗的患者结局在统计学上显著更好,5项比较报告RCT内治疗的患者结局在统计学上显著更差。在38项连续结局比较中存在显著异质性(P<0.00001,I²=58.2%)。38项比较中有30项未发现统计学显著差异。3项比较报告RCT内治疗的患者结局在统计学上显著更好,5项比较报告RCT内治疗的患者结局在统计学上显著更差。
本综述表明,参与RCT与在RCT之外接受相同治疗具有相似的结局。这些结果挑战了RCT结果不适用于常规实践的观点。