Derby Christopher D, Kolcz Jacek, Gidding Samuel, Pizarro Christian
Nemours Cardiac Center, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE 19803, United States.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Oct;34(4):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.06.040. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
Controversy surrounds the optimal method of establishing right ventricle to pulmonary artery continuity in neonates and infants with congenital heart disease. We reviewed our experience with non-valved autologous reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract to determine mid-term outcome and risk factors for reintervention.
Between 1998 and 2006, 34 consecutive patients underwent non-valved autologous right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. The need for postoperative catheter-based intervention or reoperation was assessed using relevant patient and procedure-related variables.
Diagnoses included tetralogy of Fallot with anomalous coronary (n=3), tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia (n=10), truncus arteriosus communis (n=15), and other (n=6). Median age at surgery was 5 days (1-270 days). Twenty-six (76%) patients were neonates. Median weight was 3.1kg (1.8-7.3kg). At a median follow-up of 43 months (1-90 months), 15 (50%) patients underwent reoperation and 7 (23%) underwent catheter-based intervention, with a total of 16 (53%) undergoing either reoperation or catheter-based intervention. Kaplan-Meier freedom from reintervention at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 67%, 47%, 47%, and 35% for truncus arteriosus versus 87%, 82%, 68%, and 65% for diagnoses other than truncus arteriosus (p=0.05).
Mid-term outcome following non-valved autologous reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract is satisfactory and constitutes a sound alternative to the use of small-diameter conduits in neonates and infants. In our hands, this strategy favors certain anatomic subtypes. Non-truncus patients have significantly lower rates of reintervention. Technical details associated with the anatomical reconstruction of the posterior autologous pathway may play an important role in outcomes.
对于患有先天性心脏病的新生儿和婴儿,建立右心室至肺动脉连续性的最佳方法存在争议。我们回顾了我们采用无瓣膜自体右心室流出道重建术的经验,以确定中期结果及再次干预的危险因素。
1998年至2006年期间,34例连续患者接受了无瓣膜自体右心室流出道重建术。使用相关的患者及手术相关变量评估术后基于导管的干预或再次手术的必要性。
诊断包括伴有异常冠状动脉的法洛四联症(n = 3)、伴有肺动脉闭锁的法洛四联症(n = 10)、共同动脉干(n = 15)以及其他(n = 6)。手术时的中位年龄为5天(1 - 270天)。26例(76%)患者为新生儿。中位体重为3.1千克(1.8 - 7.3千克)。中位随访43个月(1 - 90个月)时,15例(50%)患者接受了再次手术,7例(23%)接受了基于导管的干预,共有16例(53%)接受了再次手术或基于导管的干预。共同动脉干患者在6个月、1年、3年和5年时无再次干预的Kaplan - Meier生存率分别为67%、47%、47%和35%;而非共同动脉干诊断的患者分别为87%、82%、68%和65%(p = 0.05)。
无瓣膜自体右心室流出道重建术后中期结果令人满意,是新生儿和婴儿使用小口径管道的合理替代方法。在我们的经验中,这种策略对某些解剖亚型有利。非共同动脉干患者再次干预率显著较低。与自体后通路解剖重建相关的技术细节可能对结果起重要作用。