Ozcelik Ismail Bulent, Tuncer Serdar, Purisa Husrev, Sezer Ilker, Mersa Berkan, Kabakas Fatih, Celikdelen Pinar
Ist-El Hand Surgery, Microsurgery and Rehabilitation Group, Istanbul, Turkey.
Microsurgery. 2008;28(7):524-30. doi: 10.1002/micr.20543.
The sensory recovery outcomes of fingertip replantations without nerve repair were retrospectively studied. Between 2000 and 2006, 112 fingertip replantations with only arterial repair were carried out in 98 patients. About 76 of the replants survived totally, with a success rate of 67.8%. Evaluation of sensory recovery was possible in 31 patients (38 replantations). Sensory evaluation was made with Semmes-Weinstein, static and dynamic two-point discrimination, and vibration sense tests. Fingertip atrophy, nail deformities, and return to work were also evaluated. According to the Semmes-Weinstein test, 29.0% (11/38) of the fingers had normal sense, 60.5% (23/38) had diminished light touch, 7.9% (3/38) had diminished protective sensation, and 2.6% (1/38) had loss of protective sensation. Mean static and dynamic two-point discriminations were 7.2 mm (3-11 mm), and 4.60 mm (3-6 mm), respectively. Vibratory testing revealed increased vibration in 42.1% of the fingers, decreased vibration in 36.8%, and equal vibration when compared with the non-injured fingers in 21.1%. Atrophy was present in 14 (36.8%) fingers and negatively affected the results. Nail deformities, cold intolerance, return to work, and the effect of sensory education were investigated. Comparison of crush and clean cut injuries did not yield any significant difference in any of the parameters. Patients who received sensory education had significantly better results in sensory testing. The results were classified as excellent, good, and poor based on results of two-point discrimination tests. The outcome was excellent in 18 fingers and good in 20 fingers. Overall, satisfactory sensory recovery was achieved in fingertip replantations without nerve repair.
对未进行神经修复的指尖再植的感觉恢复结果进行了回顾性研究。2000年至2006年期间,98例患者进行了112例仅行动脉修复的指尖再植。约76例再植完全存活,成功率为67.8%。31例患者(38例再植)可进行感觉恢复评估。采用Semmes-Weinstein、静态和动态两点辨别以及振动觉测试进行感觉评估。还评估了指尖萎缩、指甲畸形和重返工作情况。根据Semmes-Weinstein测试,29.0%(11/38)的手指感觉正常,60.5%(23/38)的手指轻触觉减退,7.9%(3/38)的手指保护性感觉减退,2.6%(1/38)的手指保护性感觉丧失。平均静态和动态两点辨别分别为7.2毫米(3 - 11毫米)和4.60毫米(3 - 6毫米)。振动测试显示,42.1%的手指振动增强,36.8%的手指振动减弱,21.1%的手指与未受伤手指相比振动相同。14根(36.8%)手指出现萎缩,对结果产生负面影响。对挤压伤和锐器切割伤进行了比较,各项参数均无显著差异。接受感觉教育的患者在感觉测试中的结果明显更好。根据两点辨别测试结果将结果分为优、良、差。18根手指结果为优,20根手指结果为良。总体而言,未进行神经修复的指尖再植实现了令人满意的感觉恢复。