Dickinson Paul A, Lee Wang Wang, Stott Paul W, Townsend Andy I, Smart John P, Ghahramani Parviz, Hammett Tracey, Billett Linda, Behn Sheena, Gibb Ryan C, Abrahamsson Bertil
Pharmaceutical & Analytical R&D, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 2NA, England.
AAPS J. 2008 Jun;10(2):380-90. doi: 10.1208/s12248-008-9034-7. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
Quality by design (QbD) has recently been introduced in pharmaceutical product development in a regulatory context and the process of implementing such concepts in the drug approval process is presently on-going. This has the potential to allow for a more flexible regulatory approach based on understanding and optimisation of how design of a product and its manufacturing process may affect product quality. Thus, adding restrictions to manufacturing beyond what can be motivated by clinical quality brings no benefits but only additional costs. This leads to a challenge for biopharmaceutical scientists to link clinical product performance to critical manufacturing attributes. In vitro dissolution testing is clearly a key tool for this purpose and the present bioequivalence guidelines and biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) provides a platform for regulatory applications of in vitro dissolution as a marker for consistency in clinical outcomes. However, the application of these concepts might need to be further developed in the context of QbD to take advantage of the higher level of understanding that is implied and displayed in regulatory documentation utilising QbD concepts. Aspects that should be considered include identification of rate limiting steps in the absorption process that can be linked to pharmacokinetic variables and used for prediction of bioavailability variables, in vivo relevance of in vitro dissolution test conditions and performance/interpretation of specific bioavailability studies on critical formulation/process variables. This article will give some examples and suggestions how clinical relevance of dissolution testing can be achieved in the context of QbD derived from a specific case study for a BCS II compound.
质量源于设计(QbD)最近已在药品研发的监管背景下被引入,并且在药品审批过程中实施此类概念的工作目前正在进行。这有可能基于对产品设计及其制造过程如何影响产品质量的理解和优化,实现一种更灵活的监管方法。因此,对生产施加超出临床质量所要求的限制并无益处,只会增加成本。这给生物制药科学家带来了一项挑战,即要将临床产品性能与关键生产属性联系起来。体外溶出度测试显然是实现这一目标的关键工具,当前的生物等效性指南和生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)为将体外溶出度作为临床结果一致性的标志物进行监管应用提供了一个平台。然而,在质量源于设计的背景下,可能需要进一步发展这些概念的应用,以便利用在使用质量源于设计概念的监管文件中所隐含和展示的更高层次的理解。应考虑的方面包括确定吸收过程中可与药代动力学变量相关联并用于预测生物利用度变量的限速步骤、体外溶出度测试条件的体内相关性以及针对关键制剂/工艺变量的特定生物利用度研究的性能/解读。本文将通过一个BCS II类化合物的具体案例研究,给出一些在质量源于设计的背景下如何实现溶出度测试临床相关性的示例和建议。