Air quality. Court ruling scrambles clean air plans, leaving a vacuum.
作者信息
Stokstad Erik
出版信息
Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):756-7. doi: 10.1126/science.321.5890.756a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Air quality. Court ruling scrambles clean air plans, leaving a vacuum.
Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):756-7. doi: 10.1126/science.321.5890.756a.
2
Toxic air pollutants. Inspector general blasts EPA mercury analysis.
Science. 2005 Feb 11;307(5711):829-31. doi: 10.1126/science.307.5711.829a.
3
Regulatory policy. Panel: EPA proposal for air pollution short on science.
Science. 2008 Jan 11;319(5860):146. doi: 10.1126/science.319.5860.146a.
4
Is EPA blocking clean coal technology?
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Jan 1;41(1):11-2.
5
Air-quality standards. EPA adjusts a smog standard to White House preference.
Science. 2008 Mar 21;319(5870):1602-3. doi: 10.1126/science.319.5870.1602a.
6
Hazy reasoning behind clean air.
Nature. 2008 Apr 3;452(7187):519. doi: 10.1038/452519a.
7
Energy conservation. Green lights: a bright investment in the environment.
Calif Hosp. 1994 Sep-Oct;8(5):27-8.
8
Regulatory policy. EPA draws fire over air-review revisions.
Science. 2006 Dec 15;314(5806):1672-3. doi: 10.1126/science.314.5806.1672b.
9
Air permit blocks Kansas coal plants.
Nature. 2007 Oct 25;449(7165):953. doi: 10.1038/449953a.
10
Susan Dudley profile. Decision on lead emissions weighs heavily on EPA.
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):973. doi: 10.1126/science.316.5827.973b.
Zotero 插件