Suppr超能文献

使用干涉螺钉进行胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术后的临床结果

Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw.

作者信息

Mazzocca Augustus D, Cote Mark P, Arciero Cristina L, Romeo Anthony A, Arciero Robert A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Musculoskeletal Institute, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06034-4037, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):1922-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546508318192. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw has been shown to be an effective procedure from both an anatomic and biomechanical perspective. There have been no clinical outcome data on this procedure to date.

HYPOTHESIS

Subpectoral biceps tenodesis is an effective procedure in eliminating biceps tendinosis symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients who underwent subpectoral biceps tenodesis with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were evaluated using a battery of clinical outcome measures, biceps apex difference, and pain scores. A diagnosis of biceps tendinosis was made using a specific diagnostic protocol coupled with observation of biceps tendon fraying and increased erythema on dry arthroscopy.

RESULTS

Between November 2002 and August 2005, 50 patients underwent subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Complete follow-up examinations were performed in 41 of 50 (82%). There were 16 women and 25 men (mean age, 50 years). Follow-up averaged 29 months (range, 12-49 months). The mean scores were 86, Rowe; 81, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES); 9, Simple Shoulder Test (SST); 87, Constant Murley; and 84, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). There was 1 failure as demonstrated by pull-out of the tendon from the bone tunnel resulting in a "Popeye" deformity on physical examination. The mean value for biceps apex distance was 0.15 cm, with 35 of 41 patients demonstrating no difference on physical examination. Twenty-three of 41 patients had complete preoperative and postoperative examinations. All clinical outcome measures demonstrated a statistically significant improvement at follow-up when compared with the preoperative scores. Thirty-one patients had identified lesions of the rotator cuff at time of arthroscopy. The mean ASES score in patients without rotator cuff lesion (89.2 +/- 10.3) was significantly greater than the mean ASES for those with rotator cuff lesion (78.0 +/- 21.0) (P = .0324). The mean SST score in patients without rotator cuff lesion (10.6 +/- 1.5) was significantly greater than the mean ASES score for those with rotator cuff lesion (8.8 +/- 2.7) (P = .0132).

CONCLUSION

Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw is a viable treatment option for patients with symptomatic biceps tendinosis. Anterior shoulder pain and biceps symptoms were resolved with this technique. Patients with coexistent rotator cuff lesion had less favorable outcomes.

摘要

背景

从解剖学和生物力学角度来看,使用干涉螺钉进行胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术已被证明是一种有效的手术方法。迄今为止,尚无关于该手术的临床结果数据。

假设

胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术是消除肱二头肌肌腱病症状的有效手术方法。

研究设计

病例系列;证据等级,4级。

方法

对接受胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术且至少随访1年的患者,使用一系列临床结果指标、肱二头肌顶点差异和疼痛评分进行评估。采用特定的诊断方案并结合在干式关节镜检查中观察肱二头肌肌腱磨损和红斑增加来诊断肱二头肌肌腱病。

结果

2002年11月至2005年8月期间,50例患者接受了胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术。50例中的41例(82%)进行了完整的随访检查。其中有16名女性和25名男性(平均年龄50岁)。随访平均时间为29个月(范围12 - 49个月)。平均评分如下:罗伊评分86分;美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评分81分;简易肩部测试(SST)评分9分;康斯坦特·默里评分87分;单项评估数字评价(SANE)评分84分。有1例失败,表现为肌腱从骨隧道中拔出,体格检查出现“大力水手”畸形。肱二头肌顶点距离的平均值为0.15厘米,41例患者中有35例在体格检查中无差异。41例患者中有23例进行了术前和术后的完整检查。与术前评分相比,所有临床结果指标在随访时均显示出统计学上的显著改善。31例患者在关节镜检查时发现有肩袖损伤。无肩袖损伤患者的平均ASES评分为(89.2±10.3),显著高于有肩袖损伤患者的平均ASES评分(78.0±21.0)(P = 0.0324)。无肩袖损伤患者的平均SST评分为(10.6±1.5),显著高于有肩袖损伤患者的平均ASES评分(8.8±2.7)(P = 0.0132)。

结论

使用干涉螺钉进行胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术是有症状的肱二头肌肌腱病患者可行的治疗选择。该技术可缓解肩部前方疼痛和肱二头肌症状。合并肩袖损伤的患者预后较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验