van der Heijden P T, Egger J I M, Derksen J J L
Reinier van Arkel Psychiatric Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
J Pers Assess. 2008 Sep;90(5):456-64. doi: 10.1080/00223890802248745.
In this article, we evaluate internal validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) scales in the Dutch MMPI-2 normative sample (N = 1,244) and a Dutch outpatient psychiatric sample (N = 1,066). We pay special attention to a critique regarding construct drift of RC3 and the redundancy of the RC scales with existing MMPI-2 scales. The results indicate that the RC scales in both samples show comparable or better internal consistencies than the Clinical scales. Also, in both samples, the RC scales demonstrate lower scale-level intercorrelations than the Clinical scales. As to the structural characteristics, principal component analysis of the RC scales provided a clearer pattern than an analysis of the Clinical scales. Furthermore, mean raw scores on the RC scales for men in the Dutch normative sample corresponded highly with those in the U.S. normative sample except for RC2 and RC4. Less correspondence was found for women. Overall, we conclude that the RC scales show satisfactory reliability and promising internal validity in our Dutch samples. We suggest that U.S. validation studies on the RC scales may be generalized to the Dutch-language version of the MMPI-2 RC scales.
在本文中,我们评估了明尼苏达多项人格测验第二版(MMPI - 2)重构临床(RC)量表在荷兰MMPI - 2常模样本(N = 1244)和荷兰门诊精神科样本(N = 1066)中的内部效度、内部一致性和重测信度。我们特别关注了关于RC3的结构漂移以及RC量表与现有MMPI - 2量表冗余性的批评。结果表明,两个样本中的RC量表均显示出比临床量表可比或更好的内部一致性。此外,在两个样本中,RC量表显示出比临床量表更低的量表水平相互关联。关于结构特征,RC量表的主成分分析提供了比临床量表分析更清晰的模式。此外,荷兰常模样本中男性在RC量表上的原始平均得分与美国常模样本中的得分高度对应,但RC2和RC4除外。女性的对应性较低。总体而言,我们得出结论,RC量表在我们的荷兰样本中显示出令人满意的信度和有前景的内部效度。我们建议,美国对RC量表的效度研究可能适用于MMPI - 2 RC量表的荷兰语版本。