Moreno Marcelo, Wiltgen Janete Eunice, Bodanese Benito, Schmitt Ricardo Ludwig, Gutfilen Bianca, da Fonseca Lea Mirian Barbosa
Department of Radiology, Medicine School, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;27(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-29.
The detection of sub-clinical breast lesions has increased with screening mammography. Biopsy techniques can offer precision and agility in its execution, as well as patient comfort. This trial compares radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire-guided localization (WL) of breast lesions. We investigate if a procedure at the ambulatorial level (ROLL) could lead to a better aesthetic result and less postoperative pain. In addition, we intend to demonstrate the efficacy of radioguided localization and removal of occult breast lesions using radiopharmaceuticals injected directly into the lesions and correlate radiological and histopathological findings.
One hundred and twenty patients were randomized into two groups (59 WL and 61 ROLL). The patients were requested to score the cosmetic appearance of their breast after surgery, and a numerical rating scale was used to measure pain on the first postoperative day. Clearance margins were considered at > or = 10 mm for invasive cancer, > or = 5 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ, and > or = 1 mm for benign disease. Patients were subsequently treated according to the definitive histological result. When appropriate, different statistical tests were used in order to test the significance between the two groups, considering a P value < 0.05 as statistically significant.
WL and ROLL located all the occult breast lesions successfully. In the ROLL group, the specimen volume was smaller and there were more cases with clear margins (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in mean time of hospital stay between WL and ROLL (21.42 vs. 2.56 hours), but not in operative time (39.4 vs. 29.9 minutes). There were significant differences in the subjective ease of the procedures as rated by the patients (cosmetic outcomes and postoperative pain).
ROLL is an effective method for the excision of non-palpable breast lesions. It enables more careful planning of the cutaneous incision, leading to better aesthetic results, less postoperative symptoms, and smaller volumes of excised tissue.
随着乳腺钼靶筛查的开展,亚临床乳腺病变的检出率有所增加。活检技术在实施过程中可提供精准性和灵活性,同时让患者感到舒适。本试验比较了乳腺病变的放射性引导隐匿性病变定位(ROLL)和钢丝引导定位(WL)。我们研究门诊水平的操作(ROLL)是否能带来更好的美学效果和更少的术后疼痛。此外,我们旨在证明直接向病变内注射放射性药物进行放射性引导定位和切除隐匿性乳腺病变的有效性,并将放射学和组织病理学结果进行关联。
120例患者被随机分为两组(59例WL和61例ROLL)。要求患者对术后乳房的美容外观进行评分,并使用数字评分量表在术后第一天测量疼痛程度。浸润性癌的切缘>或 = 10 mm,原位导管癌>或 = 5 mm,良性疾病>或 = 1 mm。随后根据最终组织学结果对患者进行治疗。在适当情况下,使用不同的统计检验来检验两组之间的显著性,将P值<0.05视为具有统计学显著性。
WL和ROLL均成功定位了所有隐匿性乳腺病变。在ROLL组中,标本体积较小,切缘清晰的病例更多(P < 0.05)。WL和ROLL之间的平均住院时间存在显著差异(21.42对2.56小时),但手术时间无显著差异(39.4对29.9分钟)。患者对操作主观舒适度(美容效果和术后疼痛)的评价存在显著差异。
ROLL是切除不可触及乳腺病变的有效方法。它能更精确地规划皮肤切口,带来更好的美学效果、更少的术后症状以及更小的切除组织体积。