Suppr超能文献

评估临床试验的有效性。

Assessing the validity of clinical trials.

作者信息

Akobeng Anthony K

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Booth Hall Children's Hospital, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 Sep;47(3):277-82. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31816c749f.

Abstract

Clinical trials use scientific methods to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatments or other interventions. Trials should have both internal and external validity, and a well-conducted randomised controlled trial is considered to be the most powerful tool for evaluating interventions. Systematic error (bias) and random error could threaten the internal validity of trials, and all efforts should be made to minimise these in the design, conduct, and analysis of studies. Careful attention should be paid to issues such as randomisation, allocation concealment, blinding, and sample size. In an internally valid trial, external validity refers to the ability of the results to be generalised to the "real world" population. Issues to consider in determining the external validity of a study include the setting of the trial, the study population, the types of interventions used, duration of follow-up, and the types of outcome and how they were assessed.

摘要

临床试验采用科学方法来评估治疗或其他干预措施的有效性和安全性。试验应具备内部效度和外部效度,而一项实施良好的随机对照试验被认为是评估干预措施的最有力工具。系统误差(偏倚)和随机误差可能会威胁试验的内部效度,因此在研究的设计、实施和分析过程中应尽一切努力将这些误差降至最低。应仔细关注随机化、分配隐藏、盲法和样本量等问题。在一项具有内部效度的试验中,外部效度是指结果能够推广到“现实世界”人群的能力。在确定一项研究的外部效度时需要考虑的问题包括试验的环境、研究人群、所使用的干预措施类型、随访时间、结局类型以及结局的评估方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验