Pai Vinita B, Sakadjian Arpi, Puthoff Teresa D
College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Sep;28(9):1162-82. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.9.1162.
Approximately 70-80% of newborns less than 28 weeks' gestational age require pharmacologic and/or surgical intervention to close a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Indomethacin has been the pharmacologic treatment of choice and has also been used prophylactically in very premature neonates to prevent PDA. The drug, however, is associated with renal and gastrointestinal adverse effects. In July 2006, intravenous ibuprofen lysine became available in the United States for treatment of hemodynamically significant PDA. The mechanism of action for both indomethacin and ibuprofen lysine is through inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, resulting in ductal constriction. Both drugs appear to be equally efficacious in closing echocardiographically confirmed PDA. Ibuprofen lysine has demonstrated significantly less effects on cerebral, renal, and mesenteric blood flow in premature neonates when compared with indomethacin. A transient but significant increase in serum creatinine concentration, decrease in urine output, and increase in frequency of oliguria were observed with indomethacin when compared with ibuprofen lysine. However, the rate of reopening of the ductus after pharmacologic closure and the need for rescue therapy were not different between the two drugs. In addition, no differences were noted in other outcomes such as frequency of intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, or chronic lung disease, as well as in duration of mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay. When administered prophylactically, ibuprofen lysine did not prevent intraventricular hemorrhage nor provide any neurodevelopmental benefits. In addition, ibuprofen lysine has not been adequately studied in neonates of 27 weeks' gestational age or younger. Ibuprofen lysine is as efficacious as indomethacin in treating hemodynamically significant PDA in neonates greater than 27 weeks' gestational age.
孕周小于28周的新生儿中,约70 - 80%需要药物和/或手术干预来闭合具有血流动力学意义的动脉导管未闭(PDA)。吲哚美辛一直是首选的药物治疗方法,也被用于极早产儿以预防PDA。然而,该药物会导致肾脏和胃肠道不良反应。2006年7月,静脉注射赖氨酸布洛芬在美国上市,用于治疗具有血流动力学意义的PDA。吲哚美辛和赖氨酸布洛芬的作用机制都是通过抑制前列腺素合成,从而导致导管收缩。两种药物在闭合经超声心动图证实的PDA方面似乎同样有效。与吲哚美辛相比,赖氨酸布洛芬对早产儿脑、肾和肠系膜血流的影响明显较小。与赖氨酸布洛芬相比,使用吲哚美辛时观察到血清肌酐浓度短暂但显著升高、尿量减少和少尿频率增加。然而,两种药物在药物闭合后动脉导管重新开放的发生率和抢救治疗的需求方面并无差异。此外,在其他结局方面,如脑室内出血、坏死性小肠结肠炎或慢性肺病的发生率,以及机械通气时间和住院时间,均未发现差异。预防性使用时,赖氨酸布洛芬既不能预防脑室内出血,也未显示出任何神经发育方面的益处。此外,对于孕周27周及以下的新生儿,尚未对赖氨酸布洛芬进行充分研究。在治疗孕周大于27周的新生儿具有血流动力学意义的PDA方面,赖氨酸布洛芬与吲哚美辛同样有效。