You C W, Lee S Y, Park S K
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea.
Haemophilia. 2009 Jan;15(1):217-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01862.x. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
First-line treatment for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors in Korea is currently activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) as second-line therapy or as a last resort. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost and effectiveness of aPCC vs. rFVIIa for treating mild-to-moderate bleeds in inhibitor patients from the Korean reimbursement authorities' perspective. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization data (number of doses, average dose, number of outpatient visits, inpatient stays, ambulance transport and concomitant medications) were collected from an observational study involving four Korean paediatric haemophilia centres. Cost-effectiveness was modelled using a decision analysis approach and sensitivity analyses undertaken. rFVIIa was a more effective haemostatic therapy (87.1% efficacy in bleed resolution) than aPCC (64.0%). rFVIIa effected more rapid haemostasis, resolving bleeding in a mean of 6.6 h vs. 25.2 h for aPCC. Fewer rFVIIa doses were required per bleed vs. aPCC (means 1.7 and 2.3). Mean total direct medical costs from bleed initiation to cessation were estimated at Korean Won (KRW)12 460 thousand (US$12 311) for rFVIIa given as first-line therapy and KRW18 304 thousand (US$18 085) for aPCC given as first-line therapy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa vs. aPCC given as first-line therapy. In Korea, use of rFVIIa as first-line therapy for treatment of mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in inhibitor patients is both clinically effective and cost-effective compared with initial aPCC treatment. rFVIIa should be considered as the first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors in Korea.
在韩国,对于患有血友病且产生抑制物的患者,轻度至中度出血发作的一线治疗目前是活化凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂(aPCC),重组活化因子VII(rFVIIa)作为二线治疗或最后手段。本研究的目的是从韩国报销当局的角度评估aPCC与rFVIIa治疗抑制物患者轻度至中度出血的成本和效果。临床结果和资源利用数据(剂量数、平均剂量、门诊就诊次数、住院天数、救护车运输和伴随用药)来自一项涉及四个韩国儿科血友病中心的观察性研究。采用决策分析方法对成本效益进行建模,并进行敏感性分析。rFVIIa是比aPCC更有效的止血疗法(出血缓解有效率为87.1%),而aPCC为64.0%。rFVIIa实现止血更快,平均6.6小时止血,而aPCC为25.2小时。每次出血所需的rFVIIa剂量比aPCC少(平均分别为1.7和2.3)。从出血开始到停止的平均总直接医疗成本估计,一线治疗使用rFVIIa为1246万韩元(12311美元),一线治疗使用aPCC为1830.4万韩元(18085美元)。敏感性分析证实了rFVIIa与一线治疗使用aPCC相比的成本效益。在韩国,与初始aPCC治疗相比,使用rFVIIa作为抑制物患者轻度至中度出血发作的一线治疗在临床和成本效益方面均有效。在韩国,rFVIIa应被视为血友病且有抑制物患者轻度至中度出血发作的一线治疗方法。