Meara Ellen, Greenfield Shelley F
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Sep;59(9):974-81. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.9.974.
This study estimated how patterns of substance use are related to work status, public program use, and well-being among a sample of female caregivers and children.
This study assessed work, public program use, and well-being measures as a function of substance use among 1,623 female caregivers of children aged zero to four or ten to 14 who participated in the Welfare of Children and Families study and lived in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods in Boston, Chicago, and San Antonio. Data were analyzed from baseline interviews that were conducted from March through December 1999 and from follow-up interviews that were conducted 11 to 26 months after baseline (average of 16 months). Substance use patterns were placed into three categories: light or no substance use reported in both interviews, moderate or heavy substance use (that is, moderate or heavy use in both interviews or increased substance use during the study period), and reduced substance use during the study period.
Among caregivers who reduced their substance use, measures of work status, receipt of income assistance, mental health symptoms, and reports of child behavior problems were not significantly different at follow-up from those of caregivers with light or no substance use. At follow-up, compared with caregivers with light or no substance use, those with moderate or heavy substance use were significantly less likely to experience improvements in mental health symptoms and to see improvements in their children's behavioral problems. Caregivers with moderate or heavy substance use were more likely to be "detached" (p=.051)--that is, neither working nor collecting income assistance--although this difference was only marginally significant.
Caregivers with increased substance use fared poorly on measures of well-being and work. Policies that promote, rather than impede, reductions in substance use are more likely to promote self-sufficiency and well-being.
本研究评估了在一组女性照料者及其子女样本中,物质使用模式与工作状况、公共项目使用情况及幸福感之间的关系。
本研究对1623名年龄在0至4岁或10至14岁儿童的女性照料者进行了评估,这些照料者参与了“儿童与家庭福利”研究,居住在波士顿、芝加哥和圣安东尼奥的低收入和中等收入社区。分析的数据来自1999年3月至12月进行的基线访谈以及基线访谈后11至26个月(平均16个月)进行的随访访谈。物质使用模式分为三类:两次访谈均报告轻度或无物质使用;中度或重度物质使用(即两次访谈均为中度或重度使用,或在研究期间物质使用增加);以及研究期间物质使用减少。
在物质使用减少的照料者中,随访时的工作状况、收入援助领取情况、心理健康症状以及儿童行为问题报告与轻度或无物质使用的照料者相比无显著差异。随访时,与轻度或无物质使用的照料者相比,中度或重度物质使用的照料者心理健康症状改善的可能性显著降低,其子女行为问题改善的可能性也显著降低。中度或重度物质使用的照料者更有可能处于“脱离状态”(p = 0.051),即既不工作也不领取收入援助,尽管这种差异仅具有微弱的显著性。
物质使用增加的照料者在幸福感和工作方面表现较差。促进而非阻碍物质使用减少的政策更有可能促进自给自足和幸福感。