Hodges John R, Martinos Marina, Woollams Anna M, Patterson Karalyn, Adlam Anna-Lynne R
Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Cortex. 2008 Oct;44(9):1265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.018. Epub 2007 Dec 27.
To determine whether a new, simple, quick measure, the Repeat and Point test, reliably differentiates between semantic dementia (SD) and progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA). Fifteen patients with SD, six patients with PNFA and 18 healthy controls were administered the Repeat and Point test. Participants were required to repeat 10 multi-syllabic concrete nouns and, following each repetition, to point to the word's pictorial referent amongst an array of six semantically and perceptually similar foils. Patients with SD were consistently impaired relative to PNFA patients and controls on the comprehension (pointing) component of the task, whereas patients with PNFA showed no significant deficit on pointing but were impaired at the production (repeating) component. Discriminant function analysis confirmed perfect classification of the individual patients into their respective groups: criteria involving a ratio of the two scores are provided. The Repeat and Point test is particularly appropriate for routine use in a clinical context: it is quick and easy to administer and score; it reliably discriminated between the two patient groups, SD and PNFA; and it offers a simple rule of thumb, i.e., the Repeat-to-Point ratio, to aid in the diagnosis of these two language variants of frontotemporal dementia (FTD).
为了确定一种新的、简单、快速的测量方法——重复与指认测试,能否可靠地区分语义性痴呆(SD)和进行性非流畅性失语(PNFA)。对15名语义性痴呆患者、6名进行性非流畅性失语患者和18名健康对照者进行了重复与指认测试。参与者被要求重复10个多音节具体名词,每次重复后,要在一组6个语义和感知上相似的干扰项中指出该单词的图片指代物。与进行性非流畅性失语患者和对照者相比,语义性痴呆患者在任务的理解(指认)部分持续受损,而进行性非流畅性失语患者在指认方面无明显缺陷,但在产出(重复)部分受损。判别函数分析证实个体患者能被完美地分类到各自的组中:提供了涉及两个分数比值的标准。重复与指认测试特别适合在临床环境中常规使用:它实施和评分快速简便;能可靠地区分语义性痴呆和进行性非流畅性失语这两组患者;并且它提供了一个简单的经验法则,即重复与指认比值,以辅助诊断额颞叶痴呆(FTD)的这两种语言变体。