Urdaneta Rainier A, Marincola Mauro, Weed Meghan, Chuang Sung-Kiang
Private Practice, Implant Dentistry Centre, Boston, MA 02466, USA.
J Prosthodont. 2008 Oct;17(7):562-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00343.x. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
The Integrated Abutment Crown (IAC) is a technique for the fabrication of single-tooth implant-supported crowns where the abutment and the crown are one unit. The abutment-crown complex is connected to the implant with a locking taper. This technique does not use cement to retain the crown or screws to retain the abutment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of screwless, cementless single implant-supported crowns (IACs) placed in a general dental practice.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted between July 2001 and August 2003. Patients were recalled between January and March 2004. The restorations were evaluated following the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Several other variables, such as anatomic form, occlusion, soft tissue health, and reconstructive procedures, were also recorded. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariate marginal Cox Proportional Hazards Regression models, adjusted for multiple implants in the same patient, were used.
During the chart review, 108 patients were identified. A cohort of 59 patients with a total of 151 IACs met the inclusion criteria. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate for IACs was 98.7%. Two IACs were removed, one due to implant failure; the other became loose several times and was replaced with a splinted restoration. Excellent marginal adaptation was observed with no clinically discernible interface between the veneer material and the abutment. Nine maxillary anterior IACs loosened on five patients; eight of them were reinserted and continued in function without further problems for the remainder of the study. An IAC located between a tooth and an implant was 2.65 times more likely to have postinsertion complications (p= 0.05). An IAC with incorrect anatomic form (overcontoured) was 3.26 times more likely to have postinsertion complications (p= 0.01). Maxillary anterior IACs adjacent to one tooth and one implant were 3.9 times more likely to come loose (p= 0.05).
The clinical outcome of this screwless and cementless system for single implant restorations compares favorably with the experience of screw- and cement-retained single implant restorations within the observation period.
一体化基台冠(IAC)是一种用于制作单颗牙种植体支持冠的技术,其中基台和冠是一个整体。基台 - 冠复合体通过锁定锥度与种植体相连。该技术不使用粘结剂来固定冠,也不使用螺钉来固定基台。本研究的目的是评估在普通牙科诊所中放置的无螺钉、无粘结剂的单颗种植体支持冠(IAC)的临床效果。
在2001年7月至2003年8月期间进行了一项回顾性队列研究。2004年1月至3月对患者进行了回访。根据修改后的美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)标准对修复体进行评估。还记录了其他几个变量,如解剖形态、咬合、软组织健康状况和修复程序。使用描述性统计、单变量和多变量边际Cox比例风险回归模型,并对同一患者的多个种植体进行了调整。
在病历审查过程中,确定了108例患者。一组59例患者共151个IAC符合纳入标准。IAC的Kaplan - Meier生存率为98.7%。移除了2个IAC,一个是由于种植体失败;另一个多次松动,后被替换为夹板修复体。观察到边缘适应性极佳,贴面材料与基台之间在临床上没有可察觉的界面。5例患者的9个上颌前牙IAC松动;其中8个重新插入并在研究的剩余时间内继续发挥功能,没有进一步问题。位于牙齿和种植体之间的IAC发生植入后并发症的可能性高2.65倍(p = 0.05)。解剖形态不正确(外形过度)的IAC发生植入后并发症的可能性高3.26倍(p = 0.01)。与一颗牙齿和一个种植体相邻的上颌前牙IAC松动的可能性高3.9倍(p = 0.05)。
在观察期内,这种用于单颗种植体修复的无螺钉、无粘结剂系统的临床效果与使用螺钉和粘结剂固定的单颗种植体修复的经验相比具有优势。